I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.
U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
"Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)
Been there done that, it actually isn't that hard once you get over your fight or flight instinct......and actually made me more determined not to "cooperate" after looking down the barrel of an officers Glock.
I still shudder and have bad thoughts of what could have happened though, I am just glad cops are statistically lousy shots........
I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.
U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
"Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)
Maybe but the officer could get off scott-free by saying you made a "threating move", I can't remeber the official term they use but I know they have used that defense before.
I agree with you that we should resist any unlawful command and resist crocked cops. I just hope there are witnesses and better yet film of a crocked cop killing you. Unlike the Culpepper incedent were the cop is the only one still alive that knows what was said to make the lady fear for her life that she had to run.
I've had it happen several times ... pulled over for speeding,
cop pulls his gun and says "can I search your car?"
then I say: "why, you expecting to find more evidence of my speeding in the trunk?"
And as they scratch their head tell them no.
Really, chances of getting shot: zero.
All is well, remain calm!
Eye95......
In reference to the March on DC.“I am not with you. If the particular way in which you choose to break the laws is to take up arms against the government, know that I will, at the moment, choose to stand on the government's side and take up arms against you."
The statements made in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of OCDO or its members.
I'm certain there's already a thread about the Culpepper shooting incident in the Virginia sub-forum.
If someone wishes to move all discussion about that incident over to the appropriate thread, especially a moderator/administrator type person who is engaged in this discussion, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, much cleaner thread now.
What's the status of this in Auroro or CO? Didn't we have a member who was making sure this didn't get buried? Has any of the victims filed suit or threatened to file suit?
Did you read the posts you moved? Or, did you move posts based on the user name only?
See my post in the VA sub-forum - Culpeper thread, Post #1515, Page 38. That post, formerly in this thread, was in response to Tucker6900, Post #67 above which I believed at that time to be on topic for this thread.
After reviewing Tucker6900's Post #67, above, and my response to it, it appears to me that my response remains on topic.
....meh....
Liberals are very broadminded: they are always willing to give careful consideration to both sides of the same side.( Anonymous)
Howdy Folks!
Let these words pose the question:
"Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it?" Patrick Henry
Blessings,
M-Taliesin
You've got a choice, let the police search your car or let the doctor search your body for the bullets the cops will put there.
Provision for free medical attendance and nursing, for clothing, for food, for housing, for the education of children, and a hundred other matters, might with equal propriety be proposed as tending to relieve the employee of mental strain and worry. --- These matters obviously lie outside the orbit of congressional power. (Railroad Retirement Board v Alton Railroad)