Huh? No, there is no requirement to present ID to get your permit; most jurisdictions are fgollowing FFX & Chesterfield countys' lead and simply mailing the permits to applicants' homes.
Huh? No, there is no requirement to present ID to get your permit; most jurisdictions are fgollowing FFX & Chesterfield countys' lead and simply mailing the permits to applicants' homes.
So what was the point of posting that? It had no relevance to the discussion. It isn't necessary for the in state permit. I am sure there are tons of things the clerk can collect photographs for, that have no relation to an in-state handgun permit.Yes.. I am aware of that... I posted that because that section identified thatthe courtcan collect photographs.
Thanks anyway.
That's what I was going for. This thread has been about resident permits. LEO, your post was not relevant to this discussion...and I know that if the roles were reversed you would not have let me get away with such a distraction!LEO 229 wrote:So what was the point of posting that? It had no relevance to the discussion. It isn't necessary for the in state permit. I am sure there are tons of things the clerk can collect photographs for, that have no relation to an in-state handgun permit.Yes.. I am aware of that... I posted that because that section identified thatthe courtcan collect photographs.
Thanks anyway.
They are creating law out of thin air.
Huh? Absolutely not - circuit courts are NOT authorized to collect photos of CHP applicants - this was rejected by Governor Allen and the General Assembly agreed with the Governor. See http://tinyurl.com/2hqr5gYes.. I am aware of that... I posted that because that section identified thatthe courtcan collect photographs.
My wife was required to show her ID when she picked upher renewal. It only makes sense that they validatethe person receiving it is the true owner.
You could be right.... "Take a chance.. it's your life!!" :lol:hsmith wrote:That's what I was going for. This thread has been about resident permits. LEO, your post was not relevant to this discussion...and I know that if the roles were reversed you would not have let me get away with such a distraction!LEO 229 wrote:So what was the point of posting that? It had no relevance to the discussion. It isn't necessary for the in state permit. I am sure there are tons of things the clerk can collect photographs for, that have no relation to an in-state handgun permit.Yes.. I am aware of that... I posted that because that section identified thatthe courtcan collect photographs.
Thanks anyway.
They are creating law out of thin air.
Better give him a call... it is still in the code section for out of state permits....LEO 229 wrote:Huh? Absolutely not - circuit courts are NOT authorized to collect photos of CHP applicants - this was rejected by Governor Allen and the General Assembly agreed with the Governor. See http://tinyurl.com/2hqr5gYes.. I am aware of that... I posted that because that section identified thatthe courtcan collect photographs.
The following link shows the legislature's votes on Governor Allen's
recommended changes. Scroll down to Apr 5 & 6.
http://tinyurl.com/28z6gb
Item 5 deals with photographs.
Yes, well, that is why, if you are a careful reader, you will soon become tired of similar twisted words/failure to remain on-point/answering a question not asked or downright untrueresponses by themaster of verbal judo - LEO229.hsmith wrote:That's what I was going for. This thread has been about resident permits. LEO, your post was not relevant to this discussion...and I know that if the roles were reversed you would not have let me get away with such a distraction!LEO 229 wrote:So what was the point of posting that? It had no relevance to the discussion. It isn't necessary for the in state permit. I am sure there are tons of things the clerk can collect photographs for, that have no relation to an in-state handgun permit.Yes.. I am aware of that... I posted that because that section identified thatthe courtcan collect photographs.
Thanks anyway.
They are creating law out of thin air.
The sub-paragragh you cited does not pertain to the court or an application for a CHP;it pertains only to a person who (1) has a permit and (2) chooses to carry concealed pursuant to that permit. A good faith defense to your essentially off topic posts can only be maintained if you admit to haveing no clue as to statutory construction.Mike wrote:Better give him a call... it is still in the code section for out of state permits....LEO 229 wrote:Huh? Absolutely not - circuit courts are NOT authorized to collect photos of CHP applicants - this was rejected by Governor Allen and the General Assembly agreed with the Governor. See http://tinyurl.com/2hqr5gYes.. I am aware of that... I posted that because that section identified thatthe courtcan collect photographs.
The following link shows the legislature's votes on Governor Allen's
recommended changes. Scroll down to Apr 5 & 6.
http://tinyurl.com/28z6gb
Item 5 deals with photographs.
I provided, in good faith, what was currently in the state code.
Mike wrote:My wife was required to show her ID when she picked upher renewal. It only makes sense that they validatethe person receiving it is the true owner.
I could see people here bitching if a permit was given out to the wrong person. Oh Man!! They would be demanding "owner validation!!!"
But then again, this begs the question. If you intend to break the law and you aren't who the permit says you are, what does it really matter. you are still in violation of the law!
Not you since that would be <whiney voice>cop-bashing</whiney voice>, but your dis-information. And not 'battle' but dispute and argue with an anonymous cop.
Illegal aliens forge passports and visas to get into the country. Isn't that the same thing? :lol:
[align=center]UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION[/align]
I am glad you posted that, since many seem to forget. The law is clear with what is required for a CWP, and I would go so far to say that it is still to much.