Doug Huffman wrote:
Heck, no. (9658 responses)
49.9%
I'm a gun supporter, but this recent case has me rethinking the access given. (769 responses)
4.0%
Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned. (8835 responses)
45.6%
Yes, but only for idiots. (93 responses)
0.5%
I'm not sure. (5 responses)
0.0%
19360 total responses
Gotta love the way this is worded, if you don't think a "gun ban" is a good idea, the response is "heck, no", sounds like people who support their 2nd Amdt. rights are seen as children and are being treated as such. The proper response for that should have bee "No" or "No, we need to arm the Citizens further to keep this from happening again".
As for the response of "Yes, but only for idiots"...what the hell were they smoking when they wrote that? Who gets to decide whom is considered an idiot?
Anybody else feel slighted on this, or am I just being too sensitive?