Please Hit This Anti-Gun Poll.

[wrightme]

imported post

Heck, no. (44655 responses)

57.1%

I'm a gun supporter, but this recent case has me rethinking the access given. (777 responses)

1.0%

Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned. (32484 responses)

41.6%

Yes, but only for idiots. (224 responses)

0.3%

I'm not sure. (19 responses)

0.0%

• 78159 total responses (Results not scientific)

I'm a gun supporter

Is that anything like an athletic supporter? :shock:

I think a "gun supporter" is called a sling..... or a holster. Though I suppose an athletic supporter could also be called a "sling," or a "holster."

 

[Doug Huffman]

imported post

http://www.a5og.net/5-photo-gallery/22561-my-rifle-my-gun-ones-fighting-ones-fun.html

 

[Grapeshot]

imported post

Numbers are looking better every day. Keep it up.

Heck, no. (58468 responses) 63.6%

I'm a gun supporter, but this recent case has me rethinking the access given. (777 responses) 0.8%

Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned. (32484 responses) 35.3%

Yes, but only for idiots. (224 responses) 0.2%

I'm not sure. (19 responses) 0.0%

• 91972 total responses (Results not scientific)

Yata hey

Edited for spacing & clarity

 

[wrightme]

imported post

Grapeshot wrote:

Numbers are looking better every day. Keep it up.

Heck, no. (58468 responses)

63.6%
I'm a gun supporter, but this recent case has me rethinking the access given. (777 responses)

0.8%
Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned. (32484 responses)

35.3%
Yes, but only for idiots. (224 responses)

0.2%
I'm not sure. (19 responses)

0.0%

• 91972 total responses (Results not scientific)

Yata hey

Better every day? No, it looks like someone is "cookie-ing the numbers."

 

[bugly]

imported post

wrightme wrote:

Grapeshot wrote:

Numbers are looking better every day. Keep it up.

Heck, no. (58468 responses)

63.6%
I'm a gun supporter, but this recent case has me rethinking the access given. (777 responses)

0.8%
Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned. (32484 responses)

35.3%
Yes, but only for idiots. (224 responses)

0.2%
I'm not sure. (19 responses)

0.0%

• 91972 total responses (Results not scientific)

Yata hey

Better every day? No, it looks like someone is "cookie-ing the numbers."

Well, that's only a bad thing it "THEY" do it.....
oooooh, it tasted bad to say that...

 

[Grapeshot]

imported post

bugly wrote:

wrightme wrote:

Better every day? No, it looks like someone is "cookie-ing the numbers."

Well, that's only a bad thing it "THEY" do it.....
oooooh, it tasted bad to say that...

'Tain't necessarily so. We are in an information/public relations war.

Read this and see if you come to a different conclusion -
http://www.jpfo.org/kirby/kirby-hidden-weapon.htm

Yata hey

 

[AbNo]

imported post

Heck, no. (68881 responses)

67.3%
I'm a gun supporter, but this recent case has me rethinking the access given. (779 responses)

0.8%
Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned. (32486 responses)

31.7%
Yes, but only for idiots. (230 responses)

0.2%
I'm not sure. (19 responses)

0.0%

I must live in Minnesota, because my vote counted twice. :celebrate

 

[Grapeshot]

imported post

AbNo wrote:

I must live in Minnesota, because my vote counted twice. :celebrate

If you were the only one in the country with a computer, I might agree.

What doesn't make sense is that the "Heck yes" vote count has nearly tripled since the 1/26 while the anti's have increased by less than 10. We were 50% behind them and now are 100% ahead.

Did they give up - not likely. Are we utilizing their tactics better than they do - probably.

Yata hey

 

[AbNo]

imported post

You can't take away my dreams.

 

[JoeSparky]

imported post

AbNo wrote:

Imust live in Minnesota, because my vote counted twice. :celebrate

Or more likely... CHICAGO!:lol: