Nutczak
Regular Member
imported post
Doug Huffman wrote:
I agree, andthat is correct, But I think the point that is trying to be made, is that "The officer did not see the person get into the vehicle with an uncased firearm"
He called for back-up, or whatever took place because he "Did Notwitness something" not because "Hedid witnesssomething"
Now if the officer clearly witnessed to OP get into the vehicle with the firearm still in a holster, on his side. Then we may have a valid argument.
The officer "Assumed" the OP was transporting a firearmillegally.
If an officer assumes I may be flipping him the "one finger salute" even though he could not see it, does he still have RAS to violate my 1A rights of freedom of speech and expression.
BTW, flipping the bird to a police officer is protected by the 1st amendment according to the courts. While yelling and using foul language directly at the officer is not.
So if I was to say to a passenger "Ya know chet, this cop sure is a flaming bunghole that probaly screws goats during his lunchbreak" I am protected by my 1A rights. But if I tel the cop he is a bunghole goat-raper to his face, I am not protected. I believe I am also protected if I were to ask that question to an officer. Can anyone concur, or show cites to this?
Doug Huffman wrote:
no person may place, possess or transport a firearm, ... in or on a vehicle, unless the firearm is unloaded and encased ...
I agree, andthat is correct, But I think the point that is trying to be made, is that "The officer did not see the person get into the vehicle with an uncased firearm"
He called for back-up, or whatever took place because he "Did Notwitness something" not because "Hedid witnesssomething"
Now if the officer clearly witnessed to OP get into the vehicle with the firearm still in a holster, on his side. Then we may have a valid argument.
The officer "Assumed" the OP was transporting a firearmillegally.
If an officer assumes I may be flipping him the "one finger salute" even though he could not see it, does he still have RAS to violate my 1A rights of freedom of speech and expression.
BTW, flipping the bird to a police officer is protected by the 1st amendment according to the courts. While yelling and using foul language directly at the officer is not.
So if I was to say to a passenger "Ya know chet, this cop sure is a flaming bunghole that probaly screws goats during his lunchbreak" I am protected by my 1A rights. But if I tel the cop he is a bunghole goat-raper to his face, I am not protected. I believe I am also protected if I were to ask that question to an officer. Can anyone concur, or show cites to this?