SouthernBoy
Regular Member
imported post
rpyne wrote:
Or that there's something in the First Amendment that addresses "separation of church and state"?
Well, they're wrong. We know because we can read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the English contained therein is perfect and a perfect example of words having meaning.
rpyne wrote:
Perhaps the same ones who believe the Second Amendment to be a collective right?UtahJarhead wrote:Actually, most constitutional scholars will tell you that treaties override our constitution.It's not possible as laws currently stand. Treaties the US agree to are still subject to our National Constitution and if certain portions of a treaty are contrary to the Constitution, then it's not legal to enforce it.
Or that there's something in the First Amendment that addresses "separation of church and state"?
Well, they're wrong. We know because we can read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the English contained therein is perfect and a perfect example of words having meaning.