Hello Xxxxx,
I was deeply disappointed to read tonight of a response you provided which places the Seattle Public Library in direct violation of the State of Washington’s RCW’s.
In your response, quoted below, you represent the library as a sensitive government place. That is factually incorrect per, RCW 9.41.300, which clearly spells out locations which are allowed to prohibit firearms. You will notice that in no such language, libraries are not mentioned. Since the library is not listed as a place where firearms are prohibited, the Seattle Public Library system is creating a “law” or policy which directly violates RCW 9.41.290. State preemption, as linked, allows lawful citizens the right to openly carry a firearm inside the public libraries in this state, without fear of being trespassed or harassed.
I would respectfully request that the Seattle Public Library review the unlawful policy and immediately eliminate the unlawful language of this policy to coordinate with the State Law. As an example, and for your benefit, just this week the Spokane Library have amended their unlawful policy which also banned firearms in their library network as well. I hope that you will take the time to read the laws which pertain to this violation of our right’s as citizens and also encourage the change within your library network as well.
“Greetings from The Seattle Public Library. Thank you for your question about our Rules of Conduct. Under state law, the Library Board is required to enact such reasonable rules and regulations as the trustees find necessary to assure the greatest benefit to the greatest number. Because the Library is a sensitive place, like a school or government building, dedicated principally to reading and education, the Library has long had a policy that possession of firearms is incompatible with the Library's purpose. Sincerely,
Xxxxx Xxxxxxx
Communications Director”
My Best Regards,
Xxxx X. Xxxxxx