"Don't shine the light in my eyes":lol:
What a dufus:lol:
I guess it takes a former cop to support and laugh at police abuse and violating a citizens constitutional right.
Where in the constitution does it say anything about shining a light? That is just silly, I wonder who that dufus was in the video.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Shinning a high powered light at a camera at night renders the camera unable to process an image. This prevents documentation of events.
Prior Restraint is a long established legal precedent in America.
I'm sorry you hate the Bill of Rights and I'm sorry you think government officials are above the law and transparency but its illegal for police to abridge the right of the press.
There is nothing there in the above that says anything about shining a light, whispering, playing loud music to cover voices. As long as the gov does not arrest you, they can use any means to hinder you, whether intentional or not. BTW the thread has nothing to do with OC.
Is it you in the video or some other dufus?
The dufus had every legal right to video tape the light,:lol:
So, congress could meet and play loud must into to gallery or talk low? Don't frustrate our rights Mr. Guberment man.
Should be in the social lounge though.
and why was this thread moved ?
As long as the gov does not arrest you, they can use any means to hinder you, whether intentional or not.
Think about what you just wrote.
Yes congress can if they want, and they do whisper when they confer in the isle. You really make me laugh with silly assertions. Suppose you want to watch them take a dump too?
How is this video relevant to open carry of a loaded handgun?
Should be removed as 'off topic' content.
No congress cannot behave in such a manner ... what are they whispering~if they don't have the floor I think that's OK...but when they are presenting facts and making argument WE have right to know?
They cannot meet in secret....using such methods to frustrate our ability to observe and understand the happenings IS a violation of the open meetings act/FOIA and our common law rights.
You're on the wrong side of the ball on this one Wolf...
I just won a FOIA case and one of their arguments was that I could see but not hear the meeting .... THAT did not win the day for my opponent.
You have no idea why they are whispering, you do not need to know about their family, what they had for breakfast, bad or good news from a doctors visit. It is none of your business. And when they take the floor :lol: I mean really are you not aware of why they take the floor. Duhhhhhhhhh :uhoh:
So they are supposed to explain to YOU before they have a private discussion. I think most sane people would laugh in your face. Private conversations are private and you should not know them, it is none of your business. And you can't know what they are discussing if it is private, even a child can grasp the concept.I think you are making arguments not relevant to the point. Talking about them conducting the business of the state .. not if they are comparing their primary sexual organs.
So they are supposed to explain to YOU before they have a private discussion. I think most sane people would laugh in your face. Private conversations are private and you should not know them, it is none of your business. And you can't know what they are discussing if it is private, even a child can grasp the concept.
So they are supposed to explain to YOU before they have a private discussion. I think most sane people would laugh in your face. Private conversations are private and you should not know them, it is none of your business. And you can't know what they are discussing if it is private, even a child can grasp the concept.