davidmcbeth
Banned
http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/for-self-defense-22-beats-45/
yet again, another discussion on best gun to carry?
yet again, another discussion on best gun to carry?
View attachment 9219
How many people firing .22 see at least one of these per magazine, regardless of the firearm being used (bad, good, brand name, walmart special)? I'd rather fire a round that doesn't malfunction as often as it doesn't, and that's just my opinion.
I have been shooting .22 for most of my life, I have never seen one of those.
Really? What's the opposite of Murphy's, a silver spoon? Out of the three .22's I've fired, three of them created some of the above on multiple occasions or simply failed to fire necessitating a rack of the slide/bolt. I might have exaggerated a little about one per magazine, but definitely enough to be frustrating throughout an afternoon. Nope, not the ammo's fault; one of the rounds being used was CCI's Velocitor. Not the weapons either; unless Walther's p22 is way over hyped and/or I was using the lemon.
I have owned at one time or another several semi auto .22~Ruger 10/22, Sterling .22, Ruger Mark IV. I currently own a Russian bolt rifle with 5 round mag. I have never had a FTF with any of them with any .22LR ammunition. Not sure why you are having so many problems.
I have owned at one time or another several semi auto .22~Ruger 10/22, Sterling .22, Ruger Mark IV. I currently own a Russian bolt rifle with 5 round mag. I have never had a FTF with any of them with any .22LR ammunition. Not sure why you are having so many problems.
yet again, another discussion on best gun to carry?
But I had used a .22 to drop cows in a stall when they were trying to fight and it being unsafe to use the stun device. All the cows were one shot stops.
Cows are not sentient beings. They lack the brainpower to develop the necessary mens rea, or actus reus to commit a crime - against human beings or anything else. Cows react to their environment, and when they perceive a threat they generally flee the scene. A human attacker is unlikely to pause within a few feet of his/her target so you can put one in his brain box. :lol: Pax...
Cows are not sentient beings.
Cows are good prey ... ya gotta sneak up on them ...
Cows like Jazz.
[video]www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXKDu6cdXLI[/video]
I don't know why that didn't embed?
View attachment 9219
How many people firing .22 see at least one of these per magazine, regardless of the firearm being used (bad, good, brand name, walmart special)? I'd rather fire a round that doesn't malfunction as often as it doesn't, and that's just my opinion.
No gun is better than the other, if all variables are the same, and you miss cause your a poor aim. All manufacturers have good and bad apples in every batch they make. Find one that fits you and your life style. Practice makes perfect.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
If not every magazine, it's within 2 or 3 an almost always comes in 3's when it does.
I agree. It's been said for a long time, "You simply cannot miss fast enough."
It appears to be a bit of a spoof video folks, we shouldn't lend much weight to it.
Example: 2:20 in - When an attacker is hit with any round, blood starts squirting out of them, they'll feel tremendous pain and will normally surrender.
Many police officers will tell you that this isn't the reality.
If you read the parameters of the study you'll quickly find some important flaws that lead to skewed data and biases. One of the important biases that occurs with such a study is where those cases were taken from and whether or not an equal amount of cases could be identified for proper comparisons for results like incapacitation based upon caliber. For example: If you have 213 cases in the 22lr category and 1121 in the 9mm category it's already skewed data, compound that with the fact that LE does not carry 22lr and you have even more skewed data. I'm going to applaud this person for conducting his own study on the matter regardless of the biased results. A larger Nation-wide case study of this nature might be in order. As with any research, even if it isn't accurate, it's biased, skewed, or flawed in any way it still points the way to new directions to explore.
http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7866