KBCraig
Regular Member
Please see this note:
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...s-in-his-car&p=1338385&viewfull=1#post1338385
I'd go even further. I'd say any thread in which Kwik posts an opinion, or is even mentioned by reference, his detractors start in immediately with the attacks.
Look, folks, here's my request: if you think Kwik is a troll, do what we do to all trolls: ignore him. Back in the USENET days, we called it PISS.
No matter how bothersome or irritating he is, the notion that he's some personal enemy of yours because you hate him, his style of activism, his choice of guns and carry methods, and even his dog... well, that's just childish. Grow up. If you don't like him or what he's doing, there's nothing wrong with saying so, if you say so politely. But setting out to discredit and destroy him makes it a personal attack, no matter how craftily you word your replies to avoid using insults or bad language.
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...s-in-his-car&p=1338385&viewfull=1#post1338385
It seems that any thread which Kwik starts or which deals with his legal issues immediately leads to an argument. So ... my new procedure is to immediately close any Kwik thread when the first insult is thrown.
I'd go even further. I'd say any thread in which Kwik posts an opinion, or is even mentioned by reference, his detractors start in immediately with the attacks.
Look, folks, here's my request: if you think Kwik is a troll, do what we do to all trolls: ignore him. Back in the USENET days, we called it PISS.
No matter how bothersome or irritating he is, the notion that he's some personal enemy of yours because you hate him, his style of activism, his choice of guns and carry methods, and even his dog... well, that's just childish. Grow up. If you don't like him or what he's doing, there's nothing wrong with saying so, if you say so politely. But setting out to discredit and destroy him makes it a personal attack, no matter how craftily you word your replies to avoid using insults or bad language.