• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

After Council Meeting/Hooters Vid

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
imported post

Mike wrote:
The tresspass statute is very clear - not only must the person be given notice to leave, the person giving notice MUST be the owner or agent; in the power of attorney case cited above, police provided such agency notice in writing; further, as the courts have held this offense to require a willful act, not only is a bone fide if mistaken belief in authority to stay a defense, but I think it faily implied that the person ordered to leave be given notice that the police are acting as agent; finally, if the onwer is the city or its juridical entity, then preemption would appear to apply voiding the alleged rule against gun carry being enforced by resorting to tresspass law.

Succinct and to the point. Consolidates the pertainent questions.

Yata hey
 
Top