shad0wfax
Regular Member
imported post
IndianaBoy79 wrote:
That's how they remove you in WA. They don't get you for a firearm violation, they remove you as a Civil or Criminal Trespass (if you arguewith them about it)for not complying with their rules as the lessee. That's what I was referring to in my post about how they're bypassing pre-emption (in WA) on county property leased to a private party.
Others said that in ID they can't bypass pre-emption by enforcing trespass rules for firearmsin that matter on public property. I'm curious to see if this gets resolved.
IndianaBoy79 wrote:
[SNIP]you wouldn't be breaking any law by keeping your weapon on your hip, but you may be in violation of some sort of trespassing statute if asked to leave and you refused.
My 2 cents...
That's how they remove you in WA. They don't get you for a firearm violation, they remove you as a Civil or Criminal Trespass (if you arguewith them about it)for not complying with their rules as the lessee. That's what I was referring to in my post about how they're bypassing pre-emption (in WA) on county property leased to a private party.
Others said that in ID they can't bypass pre-emption by enforcing trespass rules for firearmsin that matter on public property. I'm curious to see if this gets resolved.