ixtow
Founder's Club Member
imported post
SlackwareRobert wrote:
2) Anyone not goose-stepping down the middle of University Avenue with Obama Stickers all over their body is assumed to be a Blue Ribboin swilling, toothless Redneck with machine guns and Grenades in his trailer. Non-participation in their gaudy stupidities is considered all the evidence they need to pass judgment on you as unworthy of life or freedom. That is how these people think and live here. Nobody needs to see 'my guns' or even have any real knowledge that I have any or not. They presume that I do. The crux and identifier are one and the same. The Liberal 'whistle blowers' have no idea if the person they are 'reporting' has a gun or not. Nor do they care. They're just trying to cause problems for someone who dares not worship their Messiah. They are simply dumb enough to think that owning one at all is a crime (as this sign implies) and they just make it up like they do so many other things. With an offer of $1,000 for it, they tend to use "He has a gun" quite frequently, apparently. I'm glad to know that the SO's response is now "So what?" Even though it has not always been... The combination of factors was my concern. Liberal Cops, a sign telling the populace that guns are a crime come get your money for squeeling on your political enemies, and an overwhelming majority of people who very much like that idea. Seems the SO set this thing up to do almost nothing but get a bunch of false tips and it doesn't really serve any other purpose in this environment. I get the feeling that the SO wanted to have a flowing river of excuses to go kicking down doors and harassing those who obviously didn't vote as they were told to. But it backfired and is now just a standing reminder of ulterior motives that didn't pan out. If this 'bounty program' has done anything at all to stem any kind of crime or violence, I'll eat my shorts. Twice.
When an officer uses phrases like "Are they registered?" or "Do you have a permit for those?" I know I'm dealing with a turd who didn't get the memo, or thinks she can get away with making it up as she goes. I play right into it. I pretend not to know that there are no such things here. I like to see where the Officer tries to take the 'leverage' she thinks she has after I tell her that, no, none of my guns are registered and I don't have any permits... I make no implication to knowing that neither concept exists here.
When a "tipster" does the same, it should be clear to the operator that this person is talking out their ass and just trying to send the SO on a witch hunt for daring not to have "Obama" tattooed across their face... Standing policy, as the unidentified man stated, is to disregard these 'tips.' But if the caller is a leftist, the call taker is a leftist, the dispatcher is a leftist, and the responding officer is a leftist.... Who says the policy is followed? Apparently, they've had exactly that kind of problem already and it came back to bite them on the ass.
My intent was to discover if the SO makes contact with the subject of the 'tip' in any way, and if so, does it conform to the restrictions of the 4th. I found out that it does, but not by choice.
SlackwareRobert wrote:
1) there isn't any gun registration here. Anyone mentioning it is either an idiot or on a witch hunt and testing you. It is always best to play into their hands.Did he explain how the complaintee got the serial number to check it's
registration, or how they ran the number to see it wasn't registered.
b&e or roofies...... are the only way I can see to get mine without my knowledge.
Seems to me any complaint about an unregistered gun is an open admission
to having committed a crime, or a false report (also a crime).
Involving armed police in the scam, and you have met the criteria once
you get the 'anonymous' caller convicted and your gun back.
Must be a lot of fishing and camping around there for everyone to see the guns.:shock:
2) Anyone not goose-stepping down the middle of University Avenue with Obama Stickers all over their body is assumed to be a Blue Ribboin swilling, toothless Redneck with machine guns and Grenades in his trailer. Non-participation in their gaudy stupidities is considered all the evidence they need to pass judgment on you as unworthy of life or freedom. That is how these people think and live here. Nobody needs to see 'my guns' or even have any real knowledge that I have any or not. They presume that I do. The crux and identifier are one and the same. The Liberal 'whistle blowers' have no idea if the person they are 'reporting' has a gun or not. Nor do they care. They're just trying to cause problems for someone who dares not worship their Messiah. They are simply dumb enough to think that owning one at all is a crime (as this sign implies) and they just make it up like they do so many other things. With an offer of $1,000 for it, they tend to use "He has a gun" quite frequently, apparently. I'm glad to know that the SO's response is now "So what?" Even though it has not always been... The combination of factors was my concern. Liberal Cops, a sign telling the populace that guns are a crime come get your money for squeeling on your political enemies, and an overwhelming majority of people who very much like that idea. Seems the SO set this thing up to do almost nothing but get a bunch of false tips and it doesn't really serve any other purpose in this environment. I get the feeling that the SO wanted to have a flowing river of excuses to go kicking down doors and harassing those who obviously didn't vote as they were told to. But it backfired and is now just a standing reminder of ulterior motives that didn't pan out. If this 'bounty program' has done anything at all to stem any kind of crime or violence, I'll eat my shorts. Twice.
When an officer uses phrases like "Are they registered?" or "Do you have a permit for those?" I know I'm dealing with a turd who didn't get the memo, or thinks she can get away with making it up as she goes. I play right into it. I pretend not to know that there are no such things here. I like to see where the Officer tries to take the 'leverage' she thinks she has after I tell her that, no, none of my guns are registered and I don't have any permits... I make no implication to knowing that neither concept exists here.
When a "tipster" does the same, it should be clear to the operator that this person is talking out their ass and just trying to send the SO on a witch hunt for daring not to have "Obama" tattooed across their face... Standing policy, as the unidentified man stated, is to disregard these 'tips.' But if the caller is a leftist, the call taker is a leftist, the dispatcher is a leftist, and the responding officer is a leftist.... Who says the policy is followed? Apparently, they've had exactly that kind of problem already and it came back to bite them on the ass.
My intent was to discover if the SO makes contact with the subject of the 'tip' in any way, and if so, does it conform to the restrictions of the 4th. I found out that it does, but not by choice.