• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Biden Says Obama Won't Take His Beretta

imperialism2024

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
3,047
Location
Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

yeahYeah wrote:
McCain i am sure knew who he was putting on as his VP - an nra life member and hunter.
He did so to bring gun owners on board, hoping they are too stupid to figure out the connection between gun ownership and freedom, and thus how he is a great foe of the latter. It seems to have worked...

The Second Amendment is not about hunting and being a member of the NRA. The Second Amendment is about making sure that tyrants like McCain and Obama are not allowed to exercise their will in office.
 

longwatch

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
4,327
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

I don't think you have to remind us what the 2nd Amendment is for. However, in this election, like it or not, either McCain or Obama, will win. It would be nice if we had better options but we don't, maybe next time. So who do we pick, if for no other reason, will do less damage?
 

unreconstructed1

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
695
Location
Tennessee, ,
imported post

Dukester wrote:
longwatch wrote:
Anybody with $100 can be a gun owner, but you aren't one of us. Which is someone who cares about and exercises their right to be arms.
Your right, I am not one of you, thats for sure, never pretended to be. However, I do care about 2a a long with the other 26 ammendments of the constitution. Yep, I do believe there are a total of 27 ammendments. Some of you folks seem so nearsighted with your ideologies.
yes, and 26 of those 27 amendments are of equal importance ( I am, of course, referring to the ones that were legally ratified) which is what some of you folks seem to remember. In fact, if there was one amendment of prime importance, it would be the 2nd, since it was specifically enumerated in order to defend the others...

of course, you are probably one of those folks who believe that the 2nd is talking about the national guard, right....:quirky


Oh and by the way.... fishlips? way to be a grown up and challenge her views based on merit instead of childish personal attacks.
 

imperialism2024

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
3,047
Location
Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

longwatch wrote:
I don't think you have to remind us what the 2nd Amendment is for. However, in this election, like it or not, either McCain or Obama, will win. It would be nice if we had better options but we don't, maybe next time. So who do we pick, if for no other reason, will do less damage?
Well, I figured some other members might need a refresher...

The way I view it, we have one option: oppression. Either McCain or Obama, just pick whether the country pulls to the right or the left as it slides down the slippery slope.

No, a third party isn't going to win this election. But until people stop voting for the "lesser of two evils", there is no incentive for the two major parties to try to take America in a positive direction.
 

longwatch

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
4,327
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

The game is rigged, but I think at least for gun ownership, we and our issue is becoming a third rail a politician can't mess with. Obama is trying to insulate himself with rhetoric that 'even if he wanted to he could take our guns away', McCain did so by picking Palin and uttering pro gun stances. At this time the only way we stay effective is if we reward/punish the 2 main candidates. If we stay home, we have no effect, we vote third party we have no effect, and it emboldens the antis. Put it this way if McCain loses, why would Obama fear the gun vote? Why would future republicans wish to woo it, we can't deliver a victory after all. So we matter only so long as we remain involved in the play.

In the big picture, we do need to change both parties from inside, so as you said earlier grassroots and local and state elections is a priority. Change the climate so to speak and grow politicians who respect the constitution and the rights of the people.

In the meantime if I have to choose between a ticket thats for a AWB, childproof guns, closing gun shows and whatever other gun control he can get the votes for, or a guy that may close the gun show loophole, but is otherwise been friendly to gun rights AND has a so far very pro gun VP? I'll take the 9/10 Loaf over no loaf at all.
 

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

I think that this is a rehash of the 'elephant analogy'; how does one eat an elephant, in one revolting mouthful or with many small bites?

Those willing to revulsion will vote their conscience and a 'none of the above' third party.

The elephant's death by a thousand bites approach, changing the two parties from the inside so to speak, is possible but only with principle and discipline and OCDO illustrates that these are in short supply.

Please read, understand and practice 'The Real Nature of Politics and Politicians: or America's System Works But Not the Way You Think' by Michael I Rothfeld, widely available on the web but also at http://www.rmgo.org/alerts/RealNature.shtml

I think the section Policy in the Margins or Why Grass-Roots Politics Works is on point.

Either we are equal or we are not. Good people ought to be armed where they will, with wits and guns and the truth. NRA KMfreekinA$$
 
G

Guest

Guest
imported post

hogleg wrote:
My take is McCain is more apt to be educated on the supposed gun show loop hole and the foly of his idea regarding that.
Are you kidding me??? McCain can't remember what he supports or doesn't support nor can he remember what he did last week!
 

The Donkey

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
1,114
Location
Northern Virginia
imported post

longwatch wrote:
Put it this way if McCain loses, why would Obama fear the gun vote? Why would future republicans wish to woo it, we can't deliver a victory after all. So we matter only so long as we remain involved in the play.

In the big picture, we do need to change both parties from inside, so as you said earlier grassroots and local and state elections is a priority. Change the climate so to speak and grow politicians who respect the constitution and the rights of the people.

In the meantime if I have to choose between a ticket thats for a AWB, childproof guns, closing gun shows and whatever other gun control he can get the votes for, or a guy that may close the gun show loophole, but is otherwise been friendly to gun rights AND has a so far very pro gun VP? I'll take the 9/10 Loaf over no loaf at all.

The fact is that DEMOCRATS need to respect the gun vote in order to get elected in any statewide office outside of the Northeast, Illinois andCalifornia.

Consider Warner in Virginia for example.

So you do matter and will matter no matter who gets to be President.

But YES you are absolutely right that state legislatures are where the action is and wherewe do need to be heard on BOTH sides of the aisle.
 

MetalChris

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Messages
1,215
Location
SW Ohio
imported post

KBCraig wrote:
Snip
Okay, so Jon Stewart thinks Beretta only makes handguns.
I think the vast majority of the unwashed masses thinks that. The first thing that comes to my mind when I hear "Beretta" is the M-9. Aren't their shotty's pretty high-end, like something only a rich, elitist snob might own?
 

Legba

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
1,881
Location
, ,
imported post

Yeah, let's chip in and get him a Hi-Point - give him more proletarian appeal. And no more Elmer Fudd jokes, please - my gf has already threatened to leave me after seeing me in my hunting getup.

-ljp
 

Armed

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
418
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
imported post

MetalChris wrote:
.... The first thing that comes to my mind when I hear "Beretta" is the M-9. Aren't their shotty's pretty high-end, like something only a rich, elitist snob might own?
Yep, they're not cheap. Apparently, their O/U's are supposed to be outstanding upland game bird guns.
 

PrayingForWar

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
1,701
Location
The Real World.
imported post

Dukester wrote:
hogleg wrote:
My take is McCain is more apt to be educated on the supposed gun show loop hole and the foly of his idea regarding that.
Are you kidding me??? McCain can't remember what he supports or doesn't support nor can he remember what he did last week.


Are YOU kidding anyone? Your guys have said the stupidest things we've heard all election cycle!! nObama has changed position for every crowd, and sounds like a stuttering fool off telepropmter. Uhh...Umm... I uhh...welll...you know...it's beyond my paygrade...

Those two clowns aren't fit to manage a McDonalds, it's no wonder your party icon is a jackass, it goes with the territory.
 
G

Guest

Guest
imported post

PrayingForWar wrote:
Dukester wrote:
hogleg wrote:
My take is McCain is more apt to be educated on the supposed gun show loop hole and the foly of his idea regarding that.
Are you kidding me??? McCain can't remember what he supports or doesn't support nor can he remember what he did last week.


Are YOU kidding anyone? Your guys have said the stupidest things we've heard all election cycle!! nObama has changed position for every crowd, and sounds like a stuttering fool off telepropmter. Uhh...Umm... I uhh...welll...you know...it's beyond my paygrade...

Those two clowns aren't fit to manage a McDonalds, it's no wonder your party icon is a jackass, it goes with the territory.

Yep, no more Neo Fascist, we have had enough for the last 8 years and McCant is just4 more years of Bush inept policies. I mean, look where we are now and thanks to the Repubs we are experiencing the greatest financial crisis since the Depression!CONservatives do not know how to govern, thats for sure.

Who cares about that statement he made at that Evangelical Nut Warrens Forum, Warren nothing, who freakin cares?

Just like your Moron McCant who one day says the fundamentals of the economy are strong and the very next day the economy in on the verge of crashing. Yep, McCant is a freakin idiot!
 

PrayingForWar

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
1,701
Location
The Real World.
imported post

Dukester wrote:
PrayingForWar wrote:
Dukester wrote:
hogleg wrote:
My take is McCain is more apt to be educated on the supposed gun show loop hole and the foly of his idea regarding that.
Are you kidding me??? McCain can't remember what he supports or doesn't support nor can he remember what he did last week.


Are YOU kidding anyone? Your guys have said the stupidest things we've heard all election cycle!! nObama has changed position for every crowd, and sounds like a stuttering fool off telepropmter. Uhh...Umm... I uhh...welll...you know...it's beyond my paygrade...

Those two clowns aren't fit to manage a McDonalds, it's no wonder your party icon is a jackass, it goes with the territory.

Yep, no more Neo Fascist, we have had enough for the last 8 years and McCant is just4 more years of Bush inept policies. I mean, look where we are now and thanks to the Repubs we are experiencing the greatest financial crisis since the Depression!CONservatives do not know how to govern, thats for sure.

Who cares about that statement he made at that Evangelical Nut Warrens Forum, Warren nothing, who freakin cares?

Just like your Moron McCant who one day says the fundamentals are strong and the very next day the economy in on the of crashing. Yep, McCant is a freakin idiot!

Do you think regurgitating daily kos BS over and over is making you look any smarter? This "crisis" was caused by none other than congressional dhimnocrats. Even CLINTON said they resisted republican efforts to control Fannie and Freddie. Furthermore, since the dems took over congress 2 years ago, THATS when things REALLY went downhill. Except of course in Iraq, because that's the only place republicans refused to compromise with the moonbats, and now even nObama admits the surge worked.

The fundamentals of the economy are strong, it's when liberal socialists start screwing with it that we have problems. Try again Dookie the obamabot.
 
Top