PrayingForWar
Founder's Club Member
http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=89&t=18761
This is old news of course, but it doesn't seem to occur to anyone at Brady that the 2A was put into place for the explicit purpose of endangering congress. Just a theory of mine, but it seems unlikely obamacare would have passed if the thousands of people protesting outside the capital had muskets, let alone "assault rifles and .50 caliber sniper rifles "
Like I said though, just a theory.
The Brady Campaign has posted this mass of hysterical drivel in response to the introduction of H.R. 6691: Second Amendment Enforcement Act by Rep. Travis Childers (D-MS) and currently cosponsored by 49 Democrats and 6 Republicans (if I counted correctly). They also sent a letter opposing the bill to the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the directors of the FBI and Secret Service.
The bill itself looks pretty good--it brings DC law into line with federal law and preempts much of the authority of the DC government to regulate firearms. As section 3 of the bill says:
This is old news of course, but it doesn't seem to occur to anyone at Brady that the 2A was put into place for the explicit purpose of endangering congress. Just a theory of mine, but it seems unlikely obamacare would have passed if the thousands of people protesting outside the capital had muskets, let alone "assault rifles and .50 caliber sniper rifles "
Like I said though, just a theory.