I was going to point that one out too. I am not sure what the majority of counties have done with this since preemption, I know some revised or repealed local ordinances but La Crosse County did not. I am in discussions about this with Corporate Counsel and La Crosse County DA and right now the DA feels the local local ordinance is no stricter than the State Park prohibition.
My son visits Goose Island County Park a couple times a week and recently witnessed what 'appeared' to be a friendly discussion between LEO and an open carrier there. I could not tell you if he was charged with violating the ordinance or not, I did not see anything in the news or police blotter about it. But I can tell you that the DA is still enforcing and has only advised me that the State Supreme Court has ruled that concealed carry is permitted in some situations. Of course he also said the SSC did not give any guidance so it would be totality of circumstances, LEO report, and then the DA deciding whether or not to prosecute, fairly risky to trust how that would play out.
No person shall have in his/her possession, or under his/her control, any firearm or airgun unless the same is unloaded and enclosed within a carrying case.
EXCERPT From e-mail La Crosse County DA
"....So it appears the county law is not invalidated by any state law, at least in my initial reading of it.
Here is part of the holding from Judge Alito:"
It is important to keep in mind that Heller, while striking down a law that prohibited the possession of handguns in the home, recognized that the right to keep and bear arms is not "a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose." 554 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 54). We made it clear in Heller that our holding did not cast doubt on such longstanding regulatory measures as "prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill," "laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms." Id., at ___–___ (slip op., at 54–55). We repeat those assurances here. Despite municipal respondents’ doomsday proclamations, incorporation does not imperil every law regulating firearms.
"So I don't agree at all that the court invalidated the statutes relating to carrying weapons in to public buildings, or schools, etc. In fact Alito seems to say just the opposite. Regarding concealed carry, Wisconsin has already addressed the idea that for self-defense in some situations you can conceal weapons, and I don't see anything in the McDonald or Heller decision changing that concept. In other words, you can carry a gun openly, other than in government buildings, schools, taverns, etc. You may be able to carry a concealed weapon for self defense, depending on the circumstances, and the county or city or state cannot keep you from owning weapons in your own home. Beyond that I don't see the court case changing other federal or state laws regarding carrying of firearms."