I think everyone should read this and how trespassing with a firearm could not have a not so nice outcome.
http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A124901.htm
I had a email with OFF and this was his response:
-------------------
Oregon considers some private property to be a “public place.” Movie theaters, malls, amusement parks even hotel lobbies. While they are “public places” they are still private property and the owners can post “no guns” signs and as far as I can tell, enforce them.
I believe to a certain extent this is assumed because I know of no place in Oregon law that specifically says people can post “no guns” signs, but private property is private property. So Fred Meyers can post those signs and they are presumably enforceable.
I should tell you that I know of no case law in Oregon about this from the standpoint of a place like a mall. In the case you sent, it was private property but NOT a public place. (By the way, a Multnomah County Judge has ruled that your front porch is a “public place.”)
Oregon law does not address the posting of signs about guns in public places that are private property as far as I can see. I have looked over the several trespass statutes that I think are relevant, but cannot find anything that would apply to this issue.
I do know of people who have been dragged out of movie theaters by cops for having guns when the place was posted, but there was no arrest. So I am making an assumption here to some extent.
You can use this link to find trespass statutes:
http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/orsindex/t.pdf
I could not find anything that directly addressed this. But I am fairly confident that the courts would not side with gun owners.
--------------------