conservatives' utter contempt for property rights

[twoskinsonemanns]

yeah if you own the land its your kingdom... you should be able to kill people, own slaves, and all types of things... its your land dammit!

And you are right... you do not "own" it by the definition of ownership you are using.

this is my land. If you want it you can only have by way of trade with me or by the blood of my veins.

your collectivist dribble deceptiveness will not convince me otherwise.

 

[Grapeshot]

My country, my flag. Because I choose them to be. Damn sight better than most too.

My land, is my land 'cause that is the way of it. Tread lightly when you enter the gate.

Friends are welcome with open arms.

 

[state hater]

yeah if you own the land its your kingdom... you should be able to kill people, own slaves, and all types of things... its your land dammit!

And you are right... you do not "own" it by the definition of ownership you are using.

The irony is that it's your viewpoint that entails the promotion of slavery.

People would not be free to abuse others on their land in Ancapistan. See my site, www.ancapfaq.com, for details.

 

[sudden valley gunner]

yeah if you own the land its your kingdom... you should be able to kill people, own slaves, and all types of things... its your land dammit!

And you are right... you do not "own" it by the definition of ownership you are using.

Muh 'Merica

One fallacy to another.

I noticed you failed to cite to back up your claim.

 

[marshaul]

oh.. .so the federal government can tell you some stuff you cannot do on your own land? but you own it?

Keeping slaves is not something I do with my land. It's something I do with slaves, who cannot be my property legally or ethically.

Furthermore, regulations closely tied to likely acts of tort against other landowners (industrial pollution) may be consistent with private property rights.

You have some very strange notions of property and right.