taxwhat
Regular Member
imported post
custom.45acp wrote:
custom.45acp wrote:
Safety safety safety Did I say SAFETY ! Next Never asumeunloaded ! Then Never Dry fire at wall Clock with live Ammo ! See Rule one !Then read rule two ! Read ,Understand ,NO Reset , No Replay ,No NO no , Practice ,Practice , Practice,Be Aware ,Be Boy SCOUT Ready ! Read rule one and two !Know LAW and HELP change same to make it WORK !Make Government do their Job ! ""We the People"" Accidental Discharge is = Not a Accident !RULE three Keep your finger off trigger until you wish to squeeze one or two off [ the word pull does Not exist]!Speaking of words Weapon ,Clip and pull the trigger do not exist !Never fan { Point , wave } firearm ! Rule one ,two .three Now four Know your limits ! Gun ? target and Beyond ? Ammo ? Know when to run ,duck,cover,reload ,clear jam,call 911,etc Oh and How to Avoid !Hey Taxwhat,
(I am not being sarcastic; there are things that need to be change.)
Maybe you can write a “must read column (or post it) for all those interested in obtaining their CPL” prior to them taking their unqualified class so they don’t get tangled in the woven web. This, of course, would have a detailed set of questions they can ask the instructor and that would keep law-abiding citizens from getting trapped by those nasty people not doing their jobs correctly.
Maybe, just maybe, the law should read with a little leniency. Just maybe, one instructor CAN teach 4 individuals with prior firearms experience in 5 hours total time. Maybe, (a state regulated) proficiency test prior to the class for the attendees (in the classroom, of course, don’t want cheaters to win at this too) and then the time can be attributed to the one’s knowledge. To me, and this is only my opinion, a competency should be required! Some people cannot spend less than 30 days on this topic and still have the same knowledge as some that have taken an 8-HOUR MANDATED CLASS. Time means nothing, nothing at all – it’s the knowledge and understanding of the information provided to them that is the absolute most important part.
I have friend that have attended classes that have allowed them to use a Ruger Mark type pistol for their choice of weapon for qualification, is this right? Heck NO! Both carry revolvers, one a .38 and the other .357 (with magnum loaded.)
Another important factor, NO ONE CARRIES GUN IN HAND! Part of the course should entail, drawing from a holster, concealed or open, but most definitely from a holster. This is one factor of the class that I took that scared the crap out of me. I’ve shot for many years prior to the class but have never drawn a gun from a holster. I was afraid of shooting my foot off, but with many (more than 3) hours of practice I can even do it on the run.
Let’s not worry about the minuscule things such as time limits but the actual course descriptions and literature provided to the (soon-to-be) newly trained CPL holders. I would be more afraid of the individual standing next during a robbery watching him get blown away because he had never once tried to un-holster his weapon before the fatal instant.
If we could change the outline of a CPL course, what would it be? (Write your questions in this post, please.)
Custom.45acp