Window_Seat
Regular Member
imported post
Hay all. Let this be the "Lawmakers who DO NOT support the knee jerk reaction AWB legislation in Washington State. In the title, I put a (D) before the topic title, and decided to remove it, but can't. The reason, it doesn't really matter what party affiliation they are after giving it a bit more thought.
Senator Pridemore DOES NOT support the legislation according to the telephone conversation I just had with his office staff.
Representative Jim Jacks DOES NOT support the legislation either.
Both are Democrats. I was also told on a number of occasions that WA is "not like California" when it comes to the rabid hatred of 2A rights, and that just because a (D) is a (D) does not always mean that they go around trying to push anti legislation. I might venture to think that might be true to an extent, but it seems much better than CA (where I live), so I'm not too worried about this bill going anywhere, and I still plan to move to WA when it's possible.
Erik.
Hay all. Let this be the "Lawmakers who DO NOT support the knee jerk reaction AWB legislation in Washington State. In the title, I put a (D) before the topic title, and decided to remove it, but can't. The reason, it doesn't really matter what party affiliation they are after giving it a bit more thought.
Senator Pridemore DOES NOT support the legislation according to the telephone conversation I just had with his office staff.
Representative Jim Jacks DOES NOT support the legislation either.
Both are Democrats. I was also told on a number of occasions that WA is "not like California" when it comes to the rabid hatred of 2A rights, and that just because a (D) is a (D) does not always mean that they go around trying to push anti legislation. I might venture to think that might be true to an extent, but it seems much better than CA (where I live), so I'm not too worried about this bill going anywhere, and I still plan to move to WA when it's possible.
Erik.