Dickson City, PA lawsuit filed by open carriers grinds forward

[Pa. Patriot]

imported post

Gordie wrote:

Sorry Patriot, I was writing my last post while you were posting. Still, it looks like there is no provision for co-ownership of a firearm, just a paperless transfer.

The paperless transfer essentially negates the issue... Might be why it was specified as an exception..

 

[gnbrotz]

imported post

Mike wrote:

The Pa. C. Ct. ruled in ACSL v. Rendell that the transfer data base was not an unlawful registration scheme because it did not constitute an ownership database at all!

The case was ACSL v. Ridge. A copy of the ruling can be found here.

 

[Grapeshot]

imported post

gnbrotz wrote:

Mike wrote:

The Pa. C. Ct. ruled in ACSL v. Rendell that the transfer data base was not an unlawful registration scheme because it did not constitute an ownership database at all!

The case was ACSL v. Ridge. A copy of the ruling can be found here.

It isn't a feline; its a cat = same difference.

Yata hey