eye95
Well-known member
I am sure that Shachtman is cited because the appeals court states that there is a "natural right to travel" that is limited only by the rights of others and is subject to reasonable regulation.
In my Internet searches, I have seen a lot of parroting (including some word-for-word postings) that snatch snippets from the cases, without providing links to them. The difficulty of finding a link to some of these cases really raises strong doubt that folks have actually read the decisions. Most likely, they read posts that reference the decisions, like the poster's conclusions, and simply reposted the unresearched idea somewhere else.
If someone cites a decision, they ought to at least be able to afford those reading their post the opportunity to read the decision. Otherwise, I just assume that the poster is just blowing so much smoke.
In my Internet searches, I have seen a lot of parroting (including some word-for-word postings) that snatch snippets from the cases, without providing links to them. The difficulty of finding a link to some of these cases really raises strong doubt that folks have actually read the decisions. Most likely, they read posts that reference the decisions, like the poster's conclusions, and simply reposted the unresearched idea somewhere else.
If someone cites a decision, they ought to at least be able to afford those reading their post the opportunity to read the decision. Otherwise, I just assume that the poster is just blowing so much smoke.