• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

EPIC sues DHS. DHS stated that it will monitor postings of Facebook and Twitter users

Jack House

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
2,611
Location
I80, USA
Lets's use an iphone as an example. In the past if it was turned off there was no access to the data. Now that data is synced to the cloud. My linux computer syncs to the cloud. Now I have devices that were formally secure if off that can be compromised now because the data has been uploaded to a server on the internet.

I know what cloud means. Was that example simple enough to understand?

ETA: Technically you're correct as the device can not be compromised if there is no power but we're really talking about data and you're splitting hairs.
The device can not be compromised, only the information which is stored in a cloud. I wasn't splitting hairs, I was addressing your statement for what it was. I'm still not sure how thus argument ties into the overall discussion about whether or not the government should be allowed to datamine.
 
Top