Pace
Regular Member
imported post
Spoke to a friend here in AZ who has a restaurant. He received a letter from his insurance company that says that they will now require unless there is specific insurance to cover it, that his business have a no-firearms sign. It will almost double his insurance if he wants to get around that.
He is a supporter of OC (illegal in alcohol restaurants in AZ) but he can not afford the insurance premium, so he is shopping around.
I imagine the BradyBunch is behind some insurance companies doing this, and perhaps they will push more. We need to find a way to support pro-2a businesses, so that if they chose to make this decision, they wont go out of business. Insurance in running a restaurant can often be 1/4-1/2 of your costs, imagine if its doubled?
Thoughts?
Spoke to a friend here in AZ who has a restaurant. He received a letter from his insurance company that says that they will now require unless there is specific insurance to cover it, that his business have a no-firearms sign. It will almost double his insurance if he wants to get around that.
He is a supporter of OC (illegal in alcohol restaurants in AZ) but he can not afford the insurance premium, so he is shopping around.
I imagine the BradyBunch is behind some insurance companies doing this, and perhaps they will push more. We need to find a way to support pro-2a businesses, so that if they chose to make this decision, they wont go out of business. Insurance in running a restaurant can often be 1/4-1/2 of your costs, imagine if its doubled?
Thoughts?