zigziggityzoo
Campaign Veteran
imported post
CV67PAT wrote:
SCOTUS has heard a case rendering the profanity laws unconstitutional and invalid.
Moving on.
CV67PAT wrote:
a2fireball wrote:Unlawful activity is not constitutionally protected.CV67PAT wrote:OK, lets mince words. Profanity my be illegal some places, (wrongly), but it is a constitutionally protected right. Sheeeeze!a2fireball wrote:No comparison.CV67PAT wrote:Yes you can have it both ways, private property and public property are separate. And they are supposed to be!!! Any other way to have it is socialism. Private propert rights are equally important. If TFL has reasons for not wanting OC in THEIR store, so what. They may not want you yelling profanity in there either; does that make them anti-1A?a2fireball wrote:Correct. The 2A does apply to the federal government.mikestilly wrote:OK, hold on a minute folks! The Second Amendment applies to the government infringing on the the right to keep and bear arms, not a private entity. I don't understand why some can't get this. If a business does not want OC on their property, that does not make then anti 2A. Now if you don't like it and don't want to do business with them, that's all fine and good, but that does not make them anti-2A. :banghead:Ahh, never been there was just wondering .. another anti-OC range. I'd like to see the 2A ranges and anti-2A ranges in a list.. I'd refuse to go there just like I refuse to go to Double Action .. even though it's down the street.
Pro 2A Ranges such as Southside Sportsmans Club in Battle Creek.
Support of it, without qualification, it what determines if an entity is for it or against it.
You can't have it both ways.
Either we stand together. Or we hang alone.
Yelling profanities in their store is unlawful I believe.
OC is lawful I believe.
SCOTUS has heard a case rendering the profanity laws unconstitutional and invalid.
Moving on.