Rusty
Regular Member
imported post
Reading those emails, they need some grammar training as well. I mean... ouch.
Reading those emails, they need some grammar training as well. I mean... ouch.
I did not read in depth but I saw some internet slang. Most grammer mistakes happen in private conversations like texting back and forth and the person just does not care, so I don't blame them. Although they should realize anything they discuss is available to the same people that pay their paychecks, especially when we have diligent friends here such as bad_ace!Reading those emails, they need some grammar training as well. I mean... ouch.
When on an UOC group outing, wear bags over your heads for the group picture. :lol:
I forgot about that. Well, just stand with your back to the camera. See if Sunnydale can identify your a$$.:lol:yelohamr wrote:When on an UOC group outing, wear bags over your heads for the group picture. :lol:
I have a pr of Groucho glasses. But I read somewhere, you can't wear a mask and carry.
edit: found it.
Possession of a Firearm While Wearing a Mask: It is a crime to possess a firearm in a public place or on any public street while masked so as to hide the identity of the person carrying the firearm. (Penal Code 12040).
Reading those emails, they need some grammar training as well. I mean... ouch.
Or turn around, drop your pants and give them a moon shot. Then they can identify you a$$ :what:Gundude wrote:I forgot about that. Well, just stand with your back to the camera. See if Sunnydale can identify your a$$.:lol:yelohamr wrote:When on an UOC group outing, wear bags over your heads for the group picture. :lol:
I have a pr of Groucho glasses. But I read somewhere, you can't wear a mask and carry.
edit: found it.
Possession of a Firearm While Wearing a Mask: It is a crime to possess a firearm in a public place or on any public street while masked so as to hide the identity of the person carrying the firearm. (Penal Code 12040).
When on an UOC group outing, wear bags over your heads for the group picture. :lol:
yelohamr wrote:When on an UOC group outing, wear bags over your heads for the group picture. :lol:
I have a pr of Groucho glasses. But I read somewhere, you can't wear a mask and carry.
edit: found it.
Possession of a Firearm While Wearing a Mask: It is a crime to possess a firearm in a public place or on any public street while masked so as to hide the identity of the person carrying the firearm. (Penal Code 12040).
Because they are anti-gun, anti-2A, and do not support and defend the Constitution as their oathrequires of them. But they are in favor of police weaponry on the grounds of being able "to go home to their families everynight." But that doesn't apply to you. Its called hypocrisy and tyranny and our founding fathers warned us of them.LOL SUNNYVALE PD we don't think we know the law WE KNOW THE LAW
Sunnyvale chief of police why are you targeting and investigating people who spend months to make sure they don't violate any laws. Don't you have better things to do like arrest criminals.
Yes exactly. If they were in fact anything close to Pro-2a, we would all have CCW's and this forum would likely not exist.chewy352 wrote:Because they are anti-gun, anti-2A, and do not support and defend the Constitution as their oathrequires of them. But they are in favor of police weaponry on the grounds of being able "to go home to their families everynight." But that doesn't apply to you. Its called hypocrisy and tyranny and our founding fathers warned us of them.LOL SUNNYVALE PD we don't think we know the law WE KNOW THE LAW
Sunnyvale chief of police why are you targeting and investigating people who spend months to make sure they don't violate any laws. Don't you have better things to do like arrest criminals.
And that is why civil rights complaints should be made to the FBI every time a rights violation occurs. Enough complaints will get the Bureau to investigating the department.chewy352 wrote:Because they are anti-gun, anti-2A, and do not support and defend the Constitution as their oathrequires of them. But they are in favor of police weaponry on the grounds of being able "to go home to their families everynight." But that doesn't apply to you. Its called hypocrisy and tyranny and our founding fathers warned us of them.LOL SUNNYVALE PD we don't think we know the law WE KNOW THE LAW
Sunnyvale chief of police why are you targeting and investigating people who spend months to make sure they don't violate any laws. Don't you have better things to do like arrest criminals.
it sounds like the "officers" there in Kommiefornia are just itching to be sued.
If even part of what is being commented on here is true in the PRAR'd documents, I think I know now why the notorious and incorrect Sacramento Memo is rife with fear of litigation. Is it quite possible that these LEAs know their bad policies could let them proverbally shoot themselves in the foot?
What is it called again when a LEA knowingly writes and implements bad policies that violate our rights without due process?
suntzu wrote:
it sounds like the "officers" there in Kommiefornia are just itching to be sued.
Why move to that third-world country when the food is so much better here and they are immune from prosecution?demnogis wrote:If even part of what is being commented on here is true in the PRAR'd documents, I think I know now why the notorious and incorrect Sacramento Memo is rife with fear of litigation. Is it quite possible that these LEAs know their bad policies could let them proverbally shoot themselves in the foot?
What is it called again when a LEA knowingly writes and implements bad policies that violate our rights without due process?
suntzu wrote:
it sounds like the "officers" there in Kommiefornia are just itching to be sued.
Yes.Anyone calling us terrible people to threaten to sue if our rights are knowingly violatedis asfoolish as telling a rapist victim she is terrible for getting a restraining order on her rapist.
A violation is a violation. Just because one wears a badge does not mean they should not fear repercussions if they abuse their powers. If we could send a LEO to jail for violating our rights instead of using litigation, I am sure we would take that route instead of a lawsuit. Though it doesn't quite work that way does it.
The onlytwo reasons a cop has to keep themselves in line with their duty is either respect for their job or fear for losing it.Any cop thatundermines our group as nothing but peoplelooking for litigationafter breaking our civil rights they know not to break obviously does not esteem the meaning of wearing a badge. To uphold the law.
The law is on our side. Whatever view a LEO may or may not haveabout a citizensGod given right to protect his and his familys life is insignificant. If they want that much power they should move to a police state such as North Korea.
Do they have a system for uploading, or is it just a matter of emailing links to them?Has anyone thought of uploading videosof 4A violationsto Fox News Channel?
See? O.C. is making you a better, kinder, softer person! Who needs counciling?:lol:Streetbikerr6 wrote:I wonder if they know most of us wouldn't open carry as long as they just afforded us (law abiding citizens) other ways to protect ourselves? Like have a cop follow us 24/7 as a bodyguard... or you know, if thats not feasible... A CCW!!!!! lol :banghead:
That's what got me into the movement. I wanted a CPL but my good cause is self defense which isn't good cause in San Diego. So if they wont let me hide it then they gotta look at it.
Personally I don't like UOC. I would rather be loaded and concealed. I just don't like the attention. I'm normally an A$$hole, as my wife puts it, but I have to be nice in public when I carry. Also I can't count on being able to go on a date while carrying and not be interrupted. When people ask questions I always give them a couple mins (more time if I can)and then politely excuse myself.
Looks like filling in the blanks and describing what you are uploading.yelohamr wrote:Do they have a system for uploading, or is it just a matter of emailing links to them?Has anyone thought of uploading videosof 4A violationsto Fox News Channel?