imported post
Marta is now trying to say that they are not a 'Governmental Agency'; because, they do not recieve Tax Dollars in the same way as do most other Mass Transit Agencies throughout the Country.
However, as decided under MetropolitanAtlanta Regional Transportational Authority v. Boswell 261 Ga. 427 (1991) The Georgia Supreme Court concluded that MARTA is a 'Governmental Istrumentality'. MARTA denied these findings, but they were conclusive against MARTA. However, interestingly,MARTA argued under its appelate brief, before the same Court,that it was a 'Governmental Agency' established under The Georgia General Assembly to work...[with an agency of the Local Government]... [an Agent of The City of Atlanta and neighboring DeKalb County]... for the purposes of securing 'Governmental Immunity' for its own functions.
It seem to me that MARTA only wants to get what it wants..., but when it is wrong they turn back ON THEIR OWN WORDS... to try to get out of things.
Marta is now trying to say that they are not a 'Governmental Agency'; because, they do not recieve Tax Dollars in the same way as do most other Mass Transit Agencies throughout the Country.
However, as decided under MetropolitanAtlanta Regional Transportational Authority v. Boswell 261 Ga. 427 (1991) The Georgia Supreme Court concluded that MARTA is a 'Governmental Istrumentality'. MARTA denied these findings, but they were conclusive against MARTA. However, interestingly,MARTA argued under its appelate brief, before the same Court,that it was a 'Governmental Agency' established under The Georgia General Assembly to work...[with an agency of the Local Government]... [an Agent of The City of Atlanta and neighboring DeKalb County]... for the purposes of securing 'Governmental Immunity' for its own functions.
It seem to me that MARTA only wants to get what it wants..., but when it is wrong they turn back ON THEIR OWN WORDS... to try to get out of things.