eye95
Well-known member
imported post
The law defines a "proper person." If he revokes a license arbitrarily, he can be sued.
The law defines a "proper person." If he revokes a license arbitrarily, he can be sued.
Not talking about revoking "arbitrarily." What I'm talking about is the fact that the law allows the Sheriff to issue a CC license that is conditional. Failure to abide by those conditions would be enough to identify yourself as being an improper person.The law defines a "proper person." If he revokes a license arbitrarily, he can be sued.
Exactly. OC is a right. It is legally illogical for a government official to grant an individual a privilege that restricts a right. A restriction on a CPL that says you must answer all questions posed by a LEO while carrying would be similarly unenforceable. How do you think a judge would react to a LEO asking you, "Where are you going with that pistol?" your refusing to answer, and the sheriff pulling your permit? I think he'd rule that the sheriff violated your rights by punishing you for exercising your rights.The qualifying factors on a CPL only apply to CC because the law only allows for the issuance of a permit to carry a concealed pistol. If they print a no "houses of worship" restriction then it would only apply to concealed weapons. Most Alabama CPL have the wording "This pistol permit does not permit you to openly carry" (or similar) which is supposed to make you think OC is illegal when really all it is saying is "This permit does not regulate OC." It can't restrict you from Open Carry any more that it could restrict you from voting or driving or owning a certain breed of dog. It just isn't applicable.
Just because they put it on their website does not make it true. The law is clear. Sheriffs may only revoke a permit if they find the holder not to be a "proper person." They cannot use the lawful exercise of a right as evidence of not being a "proper person." Not unless they want to explain to a judge why they are using the power of their office to stop folks from lawful exercise of a right.If you visit many of the county Sheriff's website regarding the issuance of CPLs, many of them have a little phrase like this down at the bottom of the site:
"[font="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"]The Sheriff of Shelby County has the authority to issue, deny, and/or revoke a pistol permit at his discretion."
[/font]This is what sucks. If your CPL can be revoked at the Sheriff's "discretion," then the Sheriff really doesn't have to have a hard case against you to revoke it. Especially if he's not also charging you with a crime. While Open Carry is certainly not restricted under the Alabama Code, the Sheriff can, by revoking your CPL, severely restrict your ability to reasonably exercise that right. The requirement for maintaining a CPL in order to transport a weapon in your own car is simply ridiculous
The one thing protecting gun owners in Alabama right now is the fact that no elected official in the State wants to be identified as "anti-gun." They all like being re-elected.
The best thing to do is to positively assert your rights if you are open carrying. You don't need a CPL to OC, so don't show it to them. You also don't need a driver's license to be on foot. Don't show it to them. Remind them of your rights and if they refuse to let you go about your business ask them if you are under arrest or if you are being detained. If they try and and search you or your vehicle, tell them you don't consent to the search.[font="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"]
[/font]