GoldCoaster
Regular Member
imported post
Lonnie Wilson wrote:
Any news you can provide on this will be appreciated and if you need letters written etc, let us know.
Thanks
Lonnie Wilson wrote:
This is really interesting and good news Lonnie, I've never thought the AWB made any common sense, I mean if you aren't supposed to have a weapon (banned individual) what difference does it make? You can do enough damage with a non-banned weapon as you can with one that made it to the list. The folks that own and collect them really aren't the ones going off the deep end.Radicalism is fine - ya' should been here in 1993 and 1994.
Not all of us here are in our 40's, 50's, and 60's. Connecticut's AWB will be challenged in court (on the federal level, not state) in the near to middle future. Depends on court cases out of California, Illinois, and DC.
Any news you can provide on this will be appreciated and if you need letters written etc, let us know.
Thanks