509 rifas hmm is this suppose to be a gang affiliation?
I laugh at this. Just because you have an all day drinking problem doesn't mean you have to talk smack about me. But let's pretend you are correct.
Firstly, let's pretend that this is a gang affiliation. What rights do I no longer have, assuming I am a a gang member, and recalling that every right denied to anyone based on their affiliation is also a right denied to you. Do you have less rights because you like in Yakima? Or does your neighborhood have more rights than mine? Please clarify.
And please, let's continue, and may all of the members of OCDO proceed with this notion that I, "509rifas", by a clear unintelligible avatar, am a member of a street gang (obviously, what else could you figure from my avatar?).
And now, proceeding with that assumption, that I am am a member of a criminal street gang, BUT, obviously (when you eventually watch the video) see that I have a valid CPL and carry non-stolen firearms, where then do I earn your diminished rights? Is it everyone that lives down here in the valley that doesn't have rights? Is it the white people that live in the barrio? Is it everyone that lives in the barrio? Please explain where and why people that live here lose their rights or have to "take responsibility" for their own actions for living in a high-crime neighborhood and being armed. Are you some liberal that wants me to explain how I could possibly be in a "gang territory" and carry a gun and not be a criminal? Do you think that the law abiding citizens here in what some may describe as among the worst areas in Washington State have less rights than those in your neighborhood? Please, with the assumption that I am a gang affiliated person, explain what time of night my rights die. If you are serious and not merely a drunken rambler about everything that has transpired here, please explain how my presumed gang ties diminish my rights. I am eager to hear.
OR, are you just trying to recover from your rambling about the "walking with an open container" comments that are easily refuted by merely watching the video itself. You said I was drinking in public to exercise my rights, then the video shows it was an unopened can in my pocket, and I was not drinking, and that had nothing to do with the call. The call was for something else, which I gave and give the officers that full benefit of the doubt that they were acting in good faith and believed I was their suspect. The only point of contention is when they detained me (they say I am white and was in the neighborhood) that they had RAS. If you ever read the thread, your will see that I actually defend the conduct of the officers of my city, even thought there are OCDO members that argue that my rights were abused; I am not among them. I surrendered my rights voluntarily when it was apparent they were on a real call but I was not the suspect. I have a number of other videos with terrible sound and video quality from other instances where there was no RAS other than refusing to ID in my "bad" neighborhood", and with these videos, I have decided not to post out of general respect issues, largely for the same reasons I initially declined to identify the department that stars in my videos.
But for the sake of further discussion, and we can, and I probably will, start a new thread on this, let's pretend 509 Rifas is a gang affiliation that NO-ONE can find any record of having existed, but is a real gang, and I am a member of. What rights do I not have that you do? Or is it another one of your Upper Valley nice neighborhood things?