richarcm
Regular Member
imported post
bordsnbikes wrote:
What other negative direction can we take this thread?
bordsnbikes wrote:
In my opinion....the XD9 wasn't any harder or easier to shoot than the 1911. Who cares anyways? Yes, it may have slightly more recoil than the Glock....a Corvette has slightly more spin at acceleration than a GT500....who cares? The recoil isn't exactly ideal but it does give the gun character. Is the additional recoil (assuming that it does exist which I've heard that it does) that an XD9 has over a Glock all THAT noticable? Geebus! I'm sure some of you gun "experts" can feel the difference but I doubt that the average person could. If you don't like the XD then you certainly do not have to buy it. I have one and I have ZERO problems with it. It shot pretty consistent groups for my first time with it at the range, feels PERFECT in my hands and is fairly attractive. If you prefer the Glock then be original and get one. I'm sure they are nice guns as well. I've shot them before and liked them.Dustin wrote:
A lower bore axis has nothing to do with weight stud.bordsnbikes wrote:Have her try a Glock next time, they have a lower bore axis so you won't get as much muzzle flip.
That's completely false.
Glocks weigh an average 21 oz. This is why Glocks have MORE recoil than heavier handguns. This is simple physics friend
CZ has the lowest bore angle of any handgun I've shot/seen/handled.
Once again, I have a different opinion from the rest of you folks. Maybe I shouldn't bother.
What other negative direction can we take this thread?