phred
Regular Member
..
I took the class for two reasons. To obtain my permit, and learn more about proficient use of my firearm. I got one of those things out of the class.
Which one did you get?
..
I took the class for two reasons. To obtain my permit, and learn more about proficient use of my firearm. I got one of those things out of the class.
No one knows if there will be reciprocity with other states because the law is not written yet.I will say this though, it seems he has quite the fan club here. I had no intention of starting this type of discussion. I expected this discussion to move into.."So, you think the UT class will cover WI when it passes?" or "The next class you should take is XYZ, that will bring you up to speed on cases with permit holders using their firearms in defense." etc..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_rescue#Common_lawprotias said:I am not required by law to help anyone. Please show me in any statute/case law where I am required to help my fellow man.
http://volokh.com/2009/11/03/duty-to-rescuereport-statutes/In the United States, as of 2009 ten states had laws on the books requiring that people at least notify law enforcement of and/or seek aid for strangers in peril under certain conditions: California, Florida, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin (940.34).
That's what I actually went looking for 20 minutes ago, then stumbled upon the state statutes above.Both the 1958 Geneva Convention on the High Seas and the 1982 LOS Convention provide that every state shall require the master of a vessel flying its flag, insofar as can be done without serious danger to the ship, crew, or passengers, to render assistance to any person found at sea in danger of being lost and to proceed with all possible speed to the rescue of persons in distress if informed of their need for assistance, insofar as it can reasonably be expected.
In addition, SOLAS requires the master of every merchant ship and private vessel to assist persons in distress and to broadcast warning messages with respect to dangerous conditions or hazards encountered at sea.
Which one did you get?
I'm guessing you were at Fletcher Arms since you took the class this weekend. A better man to learn how to shoot from is Bob Llanas. He will show you what you are doing incorrectly and how to correct it. He is the one I learned how to shoot from.My carry permit, or will with-in 60 days. I have to fill out the info and mail in the check.
The shooting part was 10 and 20 feet. It seemed like I could reach out and touch 10 feet, and 20/30 feet is my usual shooting distance. I was hoping to learn better skills, and have my bad habit pointed out to me. The NRA classes sound more like the classes I am looking for.
Clayton, as an instructor that has talked with GLOCK34 on many occasions, I have had the chance to see that he is not (as you say) a "Armchair Hero", but in fact educated on this matter. (Lest we forget forum rules about personal attacks)
Also, as an instructor with actual self defense experience, and far more teaching and practical experience in this matter than Mr. Bender, as well as an extensive military and civilian firearms training background, I can tell you first hand that this man has limited knowledge, and while his legal knowledge is exceptional, Bender is not a lawyer, so the legal aspect what he teaches someone is purely speculative. Aside from that the methods he teaches for the use of a handgun are dangerous.
He is selling a false sense of security. Thats It, Nothing More. Several friends of mine who are instructors, as well as myself, have made it a point to make sure that our courses are all inclusive, and not just a teaser for what the next class will be. When we offer courses, we make sure that our students are prepared in accordance with what we have offered for that course.
He has made clear that his opinion is all that he considers to be truth, and that is all that matters to him. As MkeGal hinted at, an instructor's opinion should never play a part in appropriate instruction. Opinion is not personal experience, and the best instructors in the world will tell you that it doesn't matter what they think, it only matters what happens.
LOL HAha ha ha ROFLMAO !!!!!!! If you can't keep up on the what has been said in the WISCONSIN forum for the last 6 months....KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT ! Your .02 cents is unwanted & not needed. You butt in on a on going conversation & your Freeking as CLUELESS as a dumb blond cheerleader ! Stay out of conversations that your not involved in from day 1. Seems like alot of morons chime in from MAINE.
I wish ENDING morons was legal.
Carrying a concealed weapon is not a right, it's a privilege.
"LOL HAha ha ROFLMAO" "KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT !"
oh and my favorite -
"I wish ENDING morons was legal"
So over aggressive people that type like 14 year olds and issue death threats are supposed to be good representatives of the gun community? How old are you, mid thirties? And thats how you talk to people? Youre a disgrace dude.
Im curious, do you have a link to your qualifications and proof of all the training and experience you claim you have? no offense but one random guy saying people should believe another random guy doesnt real help a whole lot. I dont know the guy i was talking to, i suppose the only reason i assumed he didnt know what he was talking about was become ive seen him make multiple offensive comments towards black people calling them savages and animals, so i just assumed his ignorance would show up elsewhere.
I just re-read the constitution and couldn't find reference to this specific mode of carrying a weapon. Will you please explain to me how certain means of bearing arms is a right and certain others are a privilege and cite your source so I can better learn it?
That was someone else that asked about your resume. An education is no substitute for intelligence.
Did you read the rest of the thread? Maybe you missed the part where I was corrected by CalicoJack10?
Privileges can be taken, rights can not be taken, even from criminals
I read the thread. I felt that perhaps this was your opinion and I wanted to know what you based it on.
felons... right to vote?
I read the thread. I felt that perhaps this was your opinion and I wanted to know what you based it on.
felons... right to vote?
I would have to agree, I think that there is some malfunction in the general idea of what someone's right is. It SHOULD be something that can't be taken away, but that just shows that government is getting to big. After all, when we started the idea was to make sure that there were some rights that the government couldn't touch, and that is why we have the "Bill Of Rights". But over the course of time, that has been manipulated by politicians and we have ended up with a "New King" as opposed to a government that is of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Elected positions were meant to be extra duties, not full time jobs. And that lasted until we were spread all across the continent.
For example, we are suppose to have "Certain Inalienable Rights" like life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Liberty has taken a serious beating at the hands of lawmakers who take away our freedoms based on their own personal interest, Life is questionable since we have law enforcement that is allowed to kill and get away with it, and the pursuit of happiness has been replaced with the desire to keep from being torn apart by the wolves that are given an iota of tenuous power.
Rights is a word that was never meant to be negotiable, but we have serious problems when we have to fight for those RIGHTS.