KYGlockster
Activist Member
"Public office" is different than being a certified peace officer/LEO. QI does not extend to the DMV employee or the city employed trash collector.
LE, at any level, anywhere, has not given a single indication that they give a rats rear end about the financial consequences a citizen experiences when LE unlawfully and likely illegally violates a citizen's rights.
Your defense of LE, irrational so it seems, is laudable and completely misplaced. Any LEO can come here and defend himself and his actions.
It is far easier to sue a city employee for their good faith mistakes than a LEO. So much so that a mere policy violation that results in a violation of the citizen's rights can be used to sue the bureaucrat. Juries are not typically sympathetic to bureaucrats but irrationally cling to the "all cops are good and have a tough job" image that LE continually rams down the throats of the citizenry.
If there were fewer LEOs on the street I'm not sure that the doom and gloom that some predict would manifest. Just as blood running in the streets did not occur when CCW is permitted. heck, Arizona is about as close to where they were in the 1880's regarding guns and I have not heard of any gun fights at high noon happening.
Kentucky has had unrestricted OC before we even gained statehood. We have no problems with this right, and we never will. The reason the crime rate is so high is because criminals do not fear cops or the law. The majority of criminals in prison have stated they are more afraid of a citizen with the means to protect themself than a cop with a belt full of gear. We have become so lax regarding violent offenders that they have no fear of the system. If we placed the responsibility of protection and justice back in the hands of the citizenry, we would watch violent crime reduce greatly! Crime didn't start obtaining these levels until we stripped these rights from the citizens.