• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Judge Says Citizens Need To Buy Guns To Protect Themselves

suntzu

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
1,230
Location
The south land
imported post

diesel556 wrote:
Task Force 16 wrote:
Flintlock wrote:
A judge commenting on the need for laws is a personal opinion and shouldn't hold anymore weight than any of our opinions. The Judicial Branch of government should shy away from legislative matters, IMO.
I agree. How many times have some of us said, "There aught to be a law against being that good looking." Or, "There aught to be a law making everybodyhave to work for a living."
I don't disagree. However, he is perfectly within is authority to state his opinion. Judge's do it all the time (read my first post). I just happen to like that this judge's opinion is pro gun.

Again, thumbs up al juez (judge)!!!
I like this pro-gun judge too...what we need is a Supreme Court whose judges are all pro-second amendment.

But I also understand the need for the judiciary to not use their positions for advocacy for or against certain positions. But at the same time I just can't help but say way to go your honor for having the backbone to say this.
 

Flintlock

Regular Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
1,224
Location
Alaska, USA
imported post

I understand what all of you are trying to say and I also like the fact that we have a judge that is pro-gun. However, what he was advocating was another law, not exercising aright as was previously metioned. We don't need another law forcing the exercising of our rights. That is my main point.
 
Top