BB62
Accomplished Advocate
I have also found out that township employees and/or officials have researched my background - which includes being a firearms instructor and a RKBA/OC activist.
This morning I went to Hamilton County's courthouse for an "ex-parte" (I believe this means only one side is heard) hearing on my request for a protection order against Judge Ralph E. Winkler. Here was my filing:
"At the conclusion of the July 12, 2010 Green Township Board of Trustees meeting, Winkler, husband of Trustee Tracy Winkler, introduced himself as Judge Winkler. Without provocation, Winkler stated that he would "defend his wife's honor" if I questioned her integrity or called her a liar. Judge Winkler appeared upset about recent revelations of indecorous, illegal, or unethical acts of elected and top-level officials (i.e. of the Township). I believe that Winkler’s threat was both menacing and coercive, and was intended to dissuade me from investigating such matters. Further, Judge Winkler's actions conveyed a threat of physical harm should I continue to speak out about improprieties."
It seems implausible to me that one could get away with such a thing (and on top of it threaten my First Amendment rights), so I thought I'd throw the subject open for consideration.
I would very much appreciate any and all help.
Thank you.
Audio of threat
This morning I went to Hamilton County's courthouse for an "ex-parte" (I believe this means only one side is heard) hearing on my request for a protection order against Judge Ralph E. Winkler. Here was my filing:
"At the conclusion of the July 12, 2010 Green Township Board of Trustees meeting, Winkler, husband of Trustee Tracy Winkler, introduced himself as Judge Winkler. Without provocation, Winkler stated that he would "defend his wife's honor" if I questioned her integrity or called her a liar. Judge Winkler appeared upset about recent revelations of indecorous, illegal, or unethical acts of elected and top-level officials (i.e. of the Township). I believe that Winkler’s threat was both menacing and coercive, and was intended to dissuade me from investigating such matters. Further, Judge Winkler's actions conveyed a threat of physical harm should I continue to speak out about improprieties."
It seems implausible to me that one could get away with such a thing (and on top of it threaten my First Amendment rights), so I thought I'd throw the subject open for consideration.
I would very much appreciate any and all help.
Thank you.
Audio of threat
Last edited: