wolf-father
Regular Member
What I found interesting is in the court rules is says you will be prosecuted under RCW 9.41.300. Yet they do not care about that law.
What I found interesting is in the court rules is says you will be prosecuted under RCW 9.41.300. Yet they do not care about that law.
Clearly not obviously. Unless like so many he is looking to be a victim. If that's the case blame his parents.
Clearly not obviously. Unless like so many he is looking to be a victim. If that's the case blame his parents.
Got a letter yesterday....federal jury pool. :uhoh:
Got a letter yesterday....federal jury pool. :uhoh:
But that is the prosecutor's call to make, and he has to do it in the courtroom and use his allowances for dismissing jurors to do it. They can't screen prospective jurors, by ANY method, in the lobby.
The question becomes: can one be excluded from jury duty just for owning a gun?
You know, reading the link to the article and all, was the guy actually excused from jury duty? I don't think anyone other than a judge actually has the authority to dismiss a juror or potential juror. The prosecution and defense can ask a judge to do it, but was it actually done in this case? Or did someone with no such actual authority kick the guy out and effectively make him evade jury duty? Is there the potential for a warrant for his arrest in his near future?
If he can be on that basis, then exercise of first amendment rights or a past demand to have a jury trial could also be used to dismiss a juror.
Well, if I was picked for a jury and I previously said that I would not convict anyone of any crime as a political method of affecting laws (first amendment right to say so), then could they kick me out of a jury pool or not?
Generally the only thing that brings out hostility on this forum is breaking the rules, particularly personal attacks.