KBCraig
Regular Member
imported post
Alexcabbie wrote:
We can't tell, because it's all in multiple quote boxes.
Alexcabbie wrote:
What did you write?
We can't tell, because it's all in multiple quote boxes.
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Ken Burns: Allowing guns in national parks is "foolish"
- Thread starter TFred
- Start date
Alexcabbie
Regular Member
imported post
Yeah, sorry. Don't know what happened but the first qute from me was the one beginning with "actually, the Bradyites harp...." So, anybody wanna say different?
Yeah, sorry. Don't know what happened but the first qute from me was the one beginning with "actually, the Bradyites harp...." So, anybody wanna say different?
imported post
Dreamer wrote:
Here is my reply on their forum:
There was a horrible trailside murder of a young female hiker in Georgia a while back.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,321107,00.html
So let me go over the usual anti-gun sentiments, because her case shreds them right up.
"No need to carry - parks are safe and patrolled by rangers, some of them armed."
Her death was lonely, unwitnessed. The killer led police to the body - it wasn't even found by a ranger or fellow hiker. Park rangers themselves are occasionally murdered, too.
"No need to carry - just learn karate, kung-fu, etc..." She was far younger than her assailant, fit and apparently knew some self-defense techniques. She was winning her fight against him, until she started losing. Somehow the tide of battle turned against her. She was tied up, smashed on the head, and decapitated.
"No need to carry - get a dog." Well, she had a dog with her on the trail. Instead of scaring off the killer or participating in her struggle for life, it simply stood by, uselessly.
Dreamer wrote:
Here is my reply on their forum:
There was a horrible trailside murder of a young female hiker in Georgia a while back.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,321107,00.html
So let me go over the usual anti-gun sentiments, because her case shreds them right up.
"No need to carry - parks are safe and patrolled by rangers, some of them armed."
Her death was lonely, unwitnessed. The killer led police to the body - it wasn't even found by a ranger or fellow hiker. Park rangers themselves are occasionally murdered, too.
"No need to carry - just learn karate, kung-fu, etc..." She was far younger than her assailant, fit and apparently knew some self-defense techniques. She was winning her fight against him, until she started losing. Somehow the tide of battle turned against her. She was tied up, smashed on the head, and decapitated.
"No need to carry - get a dog." Well, she had a dog with her on the trail. Instead of scaring off the killer or participating in her struggle for life, it simply stood by, uselessly.