Grapeshot said:
...much less to actually feel that any minor physical confrontation deserves potentially deadly force...
Verd said:
We do not know if the moment the two punks went down if they laid there peaceably and begged forgiveness, or if they were telling him that the moment they got up his ass was dead.
...
Being confronted with superior numbers
It's 2 on 1, the 2 started the fight, the 1 retreated & was pursued.
True, the one gals arm & skull were broken.
But would you really think that 2 people who had just assaulted you (apparently for questioning whether their money was real) & continued the attack would stop at slapping you around?
2 on 1. And I bet they didn't lie still; I bet they were trying to continue the attack.
Hopefully there's a behind-the-counter camera.
Jack House said:
The manager was standing there just watching.
Way to support your employees! Jerk.
At a minumum, intervene to stop the attack, which would stop the defense.
most large corporations like this have an absolute zero tolerance policy for violence, this includes clear cases of self defense.
Such stupid policies.
My school has a similar policy - no violence, period, & they consider self-defense to be fighting.
There's even a snide remark in the student handbook about people fighting, then "claiming self-defense". It says someone
may get a lighter punishment if they really were acting in self-defense, but since they admit to fighting, they will get some punishment.
Grapeshot said:
Deadly force may be justified to protect life and body from death or serious harm/injury - not "to stop a threat" absent the other qualifiers.
...
It has been reported that one woman suffered a broken arm and severe face lacerations - for what a slap, or in response to a greater level of threat?
2 on 1.
The 2 started the fight, for no good reason - questioning the money.
The 2 attackers pursued after the victim retreated.
The CNN article also has the video.
And there's this little gem:
The franchise owner Carmen Paulino told CNN affiliate WABC...
"I am extremely disturbed by the events captured on tape and am concerned for those injured," Paulino said. "The actions of this individual are unacceptable and not characteristic of my employees."
McDonald's also released a statement, saying the franchisee is cooperating with the investigation.
"The violence in this video is alarming and reprehensible," it said.
But he's not concerned enough to support his employee who defended himself against that "alarming & reprehensible" violence.
Oh, wait - he meant the self-defense was "alarming & reprehensible". :cuss:
The cashier would pause and begin again every time the women tried to get up.
There you go - they weren't through attacking.