Eric.
Regular Member
imported post
A bit of a knee jerk on my part.
A bit of a knee jerk on my part.
It is indeed an infringement on the right to keep arms. The definition of "infringe" from the time of writing was "encroach upon at the very fringes".This is not an infringement on the right to keep, nor to bear arms.
And exactly how does it affect a business without affecting a person? There is no difference. All laws and government regulation ultimately apply to people.rpyne, I concede you have a good point. I'm just not seeing this as a personal, individual infringement. It is a business regulation.
No, it is not the same concept. Being employed by a school is not a basic, natural human right, self defense, the ultimate purpose of the right to keep and bear arms, is.No one that supports a bill prohibiting employing sex offenders in schools is trying to punish the offender, they''re trying to protect the children. It's the same concept.
I am not saying that it does not affect a person. I am saying that it does not prohibit individuals from exercising their right to self defense. It establishes a regulation for a business regarding how stored firearms should be kept in that business during business hours.American Rattlesnake wrote:And exactly how does it affect a business without affecting a person? There is no difference. All laws and government regulation ultimately apply to people.rpyne, I concede you have a good point. I'm just not seeing this as a personal, individual infringement. It is a business regulation.
I agree with you that the concepts are different.ecocks wrote:No, it is not the same concept. Being employed by a school is not a basic, natural human right, self defense, the ultimate purpose of the right to keep and bear arms, is.No one that supports a bill prohibiting employing sex offenders in schools is trying to punish the offender, they''re trying to protect the children. It's the same concept.
No one that supports a bill prohibiting employing sex offenders in schools is trying to punish the offender, they''re trying to protect the children. It's the same concept.
No one that supports a bill prohibiting improperly stored firearms in a daycare is trying to punish gun owners, they're trying to protect the children. It's the same concept.