http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/08/1...t-led-to-denied-entry-at-six-flags-amusement/
What a bunch of commies!
What a bunch of commies!
.... you have to take it off … or you need to buy another shirt to put over it.”
Alejandro, who could not be reached for comment Friday, refused to remove the T-shirt from The Reconnaissance Foundation, a nonprofit group supporting Marines and their relatives, or to buy another garment, leading the security guard to call a supervisor.
- did assault and battery occur?“I saw him talk to two women in white shirts, who looked at me and then shook their heads,” he told NJ.com. “And then the man grabbed my arm and asked me to leave. I told them that it’s not offensive, that it’s a military shirt and that it means nothing. But they said: ‘I don’t care, get out of the park.’”
[quote[“I fought for this country,” he said. “I laid in a hole for 36 hours with no sleep, and had friends die for this country and so the people here could have the freedom to [do] things like visit amusement parks.
stay safe.
3 - even I see the message printed on that shirt as espousing violence
The statement on the shirt does not bother me, but the tattoos is what bothers me. The different colors of the tattoos conveys gang membership. I'm sure he has a concealed weapon. Just look at the guy.
And if true -
- did assault and battery occur?
This was in NJ, which is a may issue state, so I highly doubt he had any physical tools of protection.
Huh? Or are you one of those guys that believes OC trumps all else, including private property rights?What a bunch of commies!
Huh? Or are you one of those guys that believes OC trumps all else, including private property rights?
I thought this was a funny reply on another forum:
I can just hear the gate attendant now.
"I'm sorry sir, it's our policy, your shirt might offend or alarm someone."
well, that 300 lb whale over there in the 2 piece alarms and offends me, make her put a harbor freight tarp over that mess.
I've got a 12X8 in my truck tool box, that should do it
So, it's indoctrination ... got it!OCDO is analogous to Fat Acceptance Training
No shirt, no shoes, no service.If you are open to the public, you are no longer able to forbid anyone.
Not OT, not going there.Can you imagine what kind of shitstorm they'd receive if they said, "No black people?"
No shirt, no shoes, no service.
We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.
Proper attire required.
I don't know what it's like in WI but in Texas, private property rights are not lost where public access is afforded.
Not OT, not going there.
Are you seriously suggesting property rights are fer ****?!? LMAOJust because something is legal doesn't mean it is right.
Was I suppose to use one of those face thingies to convey sarcasm?This was in NJ, which is a may issue state, so I highly doubt he had any physical tools of protection.
Are you seriously suggesting property rights are fer ****?!? LMAO
Does that include YOUR rights?
Was I suppose to use one of those face thingies to convey sarcasm?
I see protias has withdrawn from the discussion.
Sorry, but your argument is weak. How can you possibly say that something open to the public, can prohibit people from going in. Do you also say public property is a prohibited place? You have failed to answer my question of how something being legal (refusal of allowing some entering in) is morally right.