CA_Libertarian
State Researcher
imported post
MudCamper wrote:
MudCamper wrote:
That's the job of the jury. The law assumes that if 12 of your peers agree on what is reasonable then it must be so. Of course, in reality it is easily possible to get 12 unreasonable sheeple who believe anything the TV and the prosecutor tells them...So how do we, or the police, or a DA, or a jury interpret "the person knows, or reasonably should know". That's the question. It's poorly writen law, on top of being a bad law. It needs to be repealed. Unfortunately that won't ever happen. Maybe post-Heller. But then we'll probably wina shall issue CCW law before that.