• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

New OC member for So Cal (metro LA)

CA_Libertarian

State Researcher
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
2,585
Location
Stanislaus County, California, USA
imported post

MudCamper wrote:
So how do we, or the police, or a DA, or a jury interpret "the person knows, or reasonably should know". That's the question. It's poorly writen law, on top of being a bad law. It needs to be repealed. Unfortunately that won't ever happen. Maybe post-Heller. But then we'll probably wina shall issue CCW law before that.
That's the job of the jury. The law assumes that if 12 of your peers agree on what is reasonable then it must be so. Of course, in reality it is easily possible to get 12 unreasonable sheeple who believe anything the TV and the prosecutor tells them...
 
Top