paul@paul-fisher.com
Regular Member
234 Too many from idiots and out of state.
Where are you seeing this?
234 Too many from idiots and out of state.
Or is is Geko45 risen from the mall?MINE'S BIGGER'N YOURS said:I had to demonstrate to the State of Nevada that I could shoot the Phase I (close quarter combat Law Enforcement Qualification) to the level of an FBI Agent, I hold myself to that standard every time I visit the range (at least 3-4 times per month.)
I say to my open carry friends in Wisconsin, the law may not require it, but ethics demand that you know how to safely and effectively use your weapon should you ever have to use it to lawfully defend yourself, your family, or your home.
Where are you seeing this?
COMMENTS DELETED BY MODERATOR FOR SEVERAL REASONS:
1) The description of a liberal was lifted in full from another source which is a potential copyright violation
2) We are a pro-gun site NOT a conservative site. We support ALL people who are pro-gun be they conservative, liberal or other.
3) The term libtard is offensive to those who have children that are developmentally disabled.
4) As noted by other posters, this kind of post just makes us all look bad.
While we may think that we all are clear on just what is (a) "liberal", a thread defining (a) conservative would drag on and on through the mud of unlettered ignorance.Sir, If you are not a conservative, what are you. Liberals with guns, hardly.
Please delete my account, I have no time for an organization such as this.
And OCDO is not an "organization", despite the efforts of some to be leaders, but it is a public forum for discussion of advancement of openly carried guns.
Are you quibbling http://forum.opencarry.org with http://opencarry.org?
It makes me wonder about the convictions of these two owners, Mike and John are the owners ok. For privacy, who do they share information with, who do they work for, and what are there true beliefs. Warning bells are going off, and you should here them too.
It makes me wonder about the convictions of these two owners, Mike and John are the owners ok. For privacy, who do they share information with, who do they work for, and what are there true beliefs. Warning bells are going off, and you should here them too.
John Pierce to me sounds as though he has alternate motives. This is my problem with the internet, to much of a data base can be kept on people, and used against them in the future.
I have a close friend who works for the Department of Justice in Washington, DC. He has warned me they stock pile membership list from different organizations. All in the name of public security. According to him, the law is on there side.
Depending on the people in power in Washington, DC. Your organization, can quickly get on the list of suspect organizations.
Good day Gentlemen, It is time for me to bow out.
Are they not owned by the same entity?
Yes. The forum and the main site are two faces of the same coin.
John