Johnny Law
Regular Member
imported post
sv_libertarian wrote:
sv_libertarian wrote:
You are a wise man sv, and I agree with your opinion (although not always Bears). Here's a good example for you; We are allowed to stop at a grocery or whatever type of store (on our way home, in uniform/patrol car, off duty) to pick up food or necessities. Even though I am off-duty, I will not do this, as I do not wish to be seen by other customers "doing my shopping on company time". Although most would never make a verbal comment, I know some would assume that I am shopping on the taxpayers dollar. I personally care enough that I do not want to be seen in this light, and do not want my Dept's image tarnished either by those who may "assume".I think Bear has the right to his opinion, and it is formed from his real world experiences.
I can say this much, based on my experiences with officers over the years for various reasons I would be more inclined to trust the ones who found a legit parking space than those who didn't. It's the little things that add up.
I am very much aware of the nature of my job and the company I represent. When I am wearing anything with their logo on it, I am VERY careful about my behavior because it will reflect on the company.
Same thing with cops. If officers are allowed to get away with little infractions it WILL hurt the image of the officers and the agency, justified or not.
I'm careful to make sure the image of those I represent is not tarnished when I wear their logo, and I think the same is needed of LEOs. If I piss someone off wearing my work shirt I may lose one or two customers. If a LEO does something wrong while in uniform or in a cop car, they may lose the trust of an entire community.
It's tough, but I have some understanding of what it is.