RETIREDEOD wrote:
Pa. Patriot wrote:
Tomahawk wrote:
Think about it, cool off, and join the conversation.
I gave him/her the benefit of the doubt at first... Even answered it's question.
By now I think it abundantly clear that he/she has no interest in a "discussion". He/she clearly espouses his/her "qualifications" in an apparent justification of his/her expectation that we take his/her opinion above all others here :uhoh:
He asked a question, received several answers, then continued to drone on about the question.
The icing on the cake was the accusations of the responses he received being indicators of the authors of same being unfit to carry firearms.
Yeah, IMO the REAL troll in this thread has been revealed. He/she did not come here for discussion but rather to sneak under the radar and then detonate his/her anti-OC diatribe under the guise of being a fellow gun enthusiast.
Sorry - FAIL. :lol:
My question has still not been answered by ANYONE !If it has, POINT IT OUT, or quit running your mouth about how it has been answered !! I'm not opposed to open carry,I amopposed to idiots with weapons though. Check my signature on the texas open carry petition... Check my comments on page 1 of this thread, supporting her 100%...
The problem here started when you and a few other *ssholes started slaming "Aran" for his anti veiws, then could not or would not back up your own comments. And now, being challanged to clarify your comments, you slang someone by calling them trolls also, all the while refusing to clarify the original question "what did he say". Thats how a child acts. You really need to grow up. Anyone reading here, that can follow a post can see what a bunch of idiots some of you have been...
So, in sum, Pa. Patriot, get your head out of the sand, and try to use a cell or two of that mushy stuff between your ears. What a freaking nut job !!!
Ok, I have no bone to pick with you personally. But, I do have a bone to pick with you calling people on here names and being disrespectful. If you read all the posts made by Aran, it is obvious that his commitment to open carry or even our rightsis in question.
Why do we need to rehash what Aran has said for you? If you cannot go back and read all of his posts yourself, why should we do it for you?
Specifically, in this thread, I pointed out that Aran'scomment about HER trying to stretch her 15 minutes (of fame) was totally out of line and uncalled for.
She was doing nothing wrong or illegal and has been thoroughly demeaned and mistreated by the people ELECTED and sworn to uphold the laws of PA.
They have gone so far as to question her mental stability as well asher need to LEGALLYcarrya firearm. Then, to make matters worse, the sheriff revokes her permit to carry concealedbased totally on emotion and not the law. The irony of that was that she would then be forced to always carry openly! Gotta luv it.
So, if you do not know, or understand, that this forum isprimarily for the discussion of OPEN CARRYand as such has a large population of people that are major supporters of that right, to come in and start personally attacking a member hereis bound torub the majority of the memberswrong. Also, any attack or perceived attack on our god given right to self-defense without infringement by the government is bound to create a stir.
Aran's whole demeanor and commentary has been disrespectful on a personal level to Mr's Hain and to others that have disagreed with him. He can disagree with open carry all he wants, but he shouldn't be surprised when he gets slammed for it considering the focus of this group.
I hope you do not take any of this personal, it was not meant to be.