Hollowpoint38
Regular Member
imported post
that isn't going to alter the firing is it?
that isn't going to alter the firing is it?
Maybe you can get the restaurant to post a sign like the one at my favorite Greek restaurant here in Washington.
Yes, you should. How ever, as I was once a cop I have been there and done that, lost the shirt, I would expect they would claim no knowledge and state that all had been lost. Then make every effort to" get you", even going so far as to plant evidence. You do need to cover your self. Changing the marks willdefinitely help. Talk to a lawyer. Watch your back, this Lt. looks like a nut case.I would worry that my gun's forensics is sitting in someone else's hands. You never know if some crooked SOB will get their hand on it and ruin your life.
You really ought to do whatever you can to get thatslug and casing back. If they did take it, they have no right to it at all. You commited no crime with that gun, they don't deserve its fingerprints.
I would rather the picture were of a properly holstered handgun.Maybe you can get the restaurant to post a sign like the one at my favorite Greek restaurant here in Washington.
From the sounds of it, he's just not the man for the job. If the concept of him in a leadership position simply exists because "he did his time," he has no concept of the actual requirements of the job. He should have gotten a job as a highway maintenance technician over at DOT and worked his way up to supervisor and retired.I don't think I'd be laughing. I'd be very afraid if I lived there and he had any chance of making it.Gray also said he has been ridiculed by Caucasian coworkers who “laughed hysterically” when he told them he was going to be the next chief of police.
Alabama, where the state slogan was changed to "We dare defend our rights."read your story. in complete disgust. sweet home alabama, where the skies are blue, sweet home alabama, open carry and we'll bust you.....alabama.
glad to hear things worked out for you, and the cops maybe got an education.
Hard part was you waiting to check your property outside, you needed
to check it at the counter so the clerk can witness that all of it isn't there.
Now you need to fight the lies that it all was returned to you as well as show
that the bullet they stole had sentimental value in the $1000's. That round
was a gift from C. Heston himself for donating money to loose your rights one
piece at a time, or the first round your 6 yo son ever made for you just for his
personnel protection. Now he lies awake at night worrying the bad guys will
get him. Mental anguish 6 figures.:shock:
St. John v. Alamogordo is about police doing an illegal search and seizure just because a person was legally OCing. How would that case affect a case in Alabama? Some have said that, since Alabama and New Mexico are in different federal appeals circuits, that St. John would be of no significance.SlackwareRobert wrote:Hard part was you waiting to check your property outside, you needed
to check it at the counter so the clerk can witness that all of it isn't there.
Now you need to fight the lies that it all was returned to you as well as show
that the bullet they stole had sentimental value in the $1000's. That round
was a gift from C. Heston himself for donating money to loose your rights one
piece at a time, or the first round your 6 yo son ever made for you just for his
personnel protection. Now he lies awake at night worrying the bad guys will
get him. Mental anguish 6 figures.:shock:
The issue is not whether there is monetary loss in the round. The issue is that your civil rights were violated under color of law, without reason (42 USC 1983 and 4A). The act of firing a round from a pistol for forensic fingerprinting is a search and seizure - the same way that running a serial number on a pistol is a search (so long as it is not in plain view -- COVER UP YOUR SERIALS WITH BLACK TAPE!). This is a violation of your 4th Amendment rights. They cannot hide being a shield of suspicion that you violated a nonexistent law to justify their actions.
I recommend a lawsuit in federal court under 42 USC 1983. Any civil rights attorney should take it on contingency since the latest case law on this subject as I understand the facts, is pretty compelling.
St. John v. Alamogordo is about police doing an illegal search and seizure just because a person was legally OCing. How would that case affect a case in Alabama? Some have said that, since Alabama and New Mexico are in different federal appeals circuits, that St. John would be of no significance.