imported post
possumboy wrote:
I am not bashing LEO's but just remember the "Off duty cop in alleged road rage shooting" case inwhich it seemed as ifthe shooterdid not know the target other than there was someone on the other side of the glass.
Never heard anything more on the case so I do not know how it turned out but just thinking of recent events similar where decisions were made and shots fired.
possumboy wrote:
LEO 229 wrote:Again, still contested. He may have knew his target, just not know it was a LEO. The trial will determine if he is telling the truth about if the LEO was visible, or if the CPD is telling the truth with him just firing through the door.KNOW YOUR TARGET AND WHAT IS BEYOND!!! I know someone that did not.
It is not contested that you need to know your target what is beyond.
I am not bashing LEO's but just remember the "Off duty cop in alleged road rage shooting" case inwhich it seemed as ifthe shooterdid not know the target other than there was someone on the other side of the glass.
Never heard anything more on the case so I do not know how it turned out but just thinking of recent events similar where decisions were made and shots fired.