roadside drug tests - now in use

[eye95]

I agree eye. Thanks for the tip I do appreciate it. At this point I'm content with the naysayers nay saying. Even if they had a third party verify they would just find something else to bash about. My focus is still meeting and conversing with those that are reasonable enough to listen and take things at face value and to provide the flip side of the coin when the same naysayers bash leos in general.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

You are right. They would find a way to poo-poo any proof you posted of your contention. I watched you flat-out post a direct answer to a direct question in another thread and witnessed a bunch of juveniles take that direct answer and contort into all manner of things you did not say. It is getting embarrassing to be associated with them.

Still, I am curious to see your profession verified. And I promise that I am genuinely asking and will treat your efforts to answer with respect. Like I said, CCJ seems to be one of the few interacting with you honestly. He would be a good candidate to trust. OCforMe is another. MyWifeSaidYes, BB62, SFCRetired... There are lots of good folk here. It's just the the jerks are noisier than the adults.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

 

[sudden valley gunner]

There u go ww there's your cite for you.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

You are not very perceptive are you?

No where did I call all cops a name, disagreeing with the system, is not name calling.

You just can't get past that because you love the system, you have offered continually apologia for just about ever jackbooted thing these agencies do.

Those who support that system unconditionally are part of the problem.

 

[eye95]

I disagree. You did. And Primus provided the cite.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

 

[sudden valley gunner]

I disagree. You did. And Primus provided the cite.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

So? Just because you disagree doesn't make it true.

Disagreeing with a rotten system and being in wonder why anyone would make apologia for it or work for the system isn't name calling.

 

[eye95]

Just providing another perspective for others to consider apart from the did-not-did-too-did-not.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

 

[sudden valley gunner]

Just providing another perspective for others to consider apart from the did-not-did-too-did-not.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

By saying did too?

 

[eye95]

No, by being an external observer to the conversation.

Some folks here need to kick it up a notch--especially when dealing with Primus. He is acting much more the rational adult than those discussing with him. That does not help persuade him nor any readers who are not posting.

If your goal is to change hearts and minds, you should post at the level that you normally do. I really think that Primus' perspective can be altered somewhat, but certainly not by being approached in the way most here have.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

 

[sudden valley gunner]

No, by being an external observer to the conversation.

Some folks here need to kick it up a notch--especially when dealing with Primus. He is acting much more the rational adult than those discussing with him. That does not help persuade him nor any readers who are not posting.

If your goal is to change hearts and minds, you should post at the level that you normally do. I really think that Primus' perspective can be altered somewhat, but certainly not by being approached in the way most here have.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

Pardon? He's been acting like the adult? Sorry I don't see it, many tried talking to him like a logical thinking adult and he has refused to engage in it. His replies are full of twists, lies, fallacies and misdirection while insulting posters with his assumptions that if they don't believe as he does, they are naive, not normal, can't think.....etc.

 

[eye95]

Pardon? He's been acting like the adult? Sorry I don't see it, many tried talking to him like a logical thinking adult and he has refused to engage in it. His replies are full of twists, lies, fallacies and misdirection while insulting posters with his assumptions that if they don't believe as he does, they are naive, not normal, can't think.....etc.

Moreso than those addressing him--by FAR.

Anyway, I have said what I wanted to communicate. Moving on from this line of discussion.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

 

[Bernymac]

uh---what happened to the "roadside drug tests" thread? :uhoh:

 

[Fuller Malarkey]

No, by being an external observer to the conversation.

Some folks here need to kick it up a notch--especially when dealing with Primus. He is acting much more the rational adult than those discussing with him. That does not help persuade him nor any readers who are not posting.

If your goal is to change hearts and minds, you should post at the level that you normally do. I really think that Primus' perspective can be altered somewhat, but certainly not by being approached in the way most here have.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

I think once you enter the fray, you are no longer external, especially if you partake in a confrontive manner.

As far as Primus, I am under no obligation to ignore his intellectual dishonesty and the ongoing use of logical fallacies. His claimed badge has not earned him the level of disrespect his antics have. He has intentionally derailed threads with straw man and red herring, which I find to be more disruptive than a p_ssing contest over what should be included in the description of a posted video.

 

[Fuller Malarkey]

uh---what happened to the "roadside drug tests" thread? :uhoh:

Derailed by Pinus and eye95 is flagging other users to follow.