Haman J.T.
New member
The problem with this bill is the same problem I had getting my CPL.The CPL board tried to use MCL 28.425b,7n (Issuing a license to the applicant to carry a concealed pistol in this state is not detrimental to the safety of the applicant or to any other individual).Thats as vague as a 99' law that states (a person who has had 2 drinking and driving convictions in a 10 year period must drive with an interlock device for 365 days).You would think that means "in the last 10 years",yet when I appealed at SOS for my license in 05' they went back to 92' & 94' to get 2 in 10.Thats 13 years.The CPL board tried to use this also,even though I was beyond the 3 & 8 year list in the law by using the vague attachments to the MCL above.
It's important that we make sure any law is written without any vagueness that the government(judges,DA's,police) can use against the citizens,who then need money to hire lawyers etc. etc.!
It's important that we make sure any law is written without any vagueness that the government(judges,DA's,police) can use against the citizens,who then need money to hire lawyers etc. etc.!