mastiff69
Regular Member
imported post
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_colo_school_shooting
GRRR !!!! just miles from combine school
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_colo_school_shooting
GRRR !!!! just miles from combine school
I hope he gets his ticketed for having a firearm in a gun free zone.It has to be a media error....convicted felons can't have guns...it's against the law!:uhoh::uhoh:
just think what would have happened if a law abiding citizen were to be legally carrying there. . . :what:
If you were prosecuted I doubt any jury would ever convict you (besides that, I'll bet a prosecutor would be looking for a new job come election time).OK....I was sitting here wondering. If I am dropping off my son and see this idiot shooting kids would I be charged if I had stepped out of my truck and planted said shooter where he stood? After all I would be discharging a weapon on school property......hmmmmm :uhoh::uhoh::uhoh:
Edited for spelling....DOH!
Even if the permit holder was not charged, the Brady Bunch would be all over it and I doubt it would have any effectwhatsoever towards repealing the GFSZ.+1,000,000
I truly beleive that such a case, where some permit holder, or OCer clearly stopped a columbine situation, would be the only way to get rid of these GFSZ.
780.972 Use of deadly force by individual not engaged in commission of crime; conditions. Sec. 2. (1) An individual who has not or is not engaged in the commission of a crime at the time he or she uses deadly force may use deadly force against another individual anywhere he or she has the legal right to be with no duty to retreat if either of the following applies: (a) The individual honestly and reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the imminent death of or imminent great bodily harm to himself or herself or to another individual. (b) The individual honestly and reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the imminent sexual assault of himself or herself or of another individual. (2) An individual who has not or is not engaged in the commission of a crime at the time he or she uses force other than deadly force may use force other than deadly force against another individual anywhere he or she has the legal right to be with no duty to retreat if he or she honestly and reasonably believes that the use of that force is necessary to defend himself or herself or another individual from the imminent unlawful use of force by another individual.