Kildars
Regular Member
Just wondering, why was his CPL not revoked when he was charged with DV in 2008? Or does he have to be convicted?
In order for there to be any repercussions in our legal system, there has to be a conviction. That is for good reason too, we are innocent until proven guilty.
However, this shooter displayed a patter of violent and aggressive and unstable behavior. The system failed by dismissing charges multiple times, according to the KIRO article there were over four different episodes where he was charged with Assault, DV, or something else violent and it was all dismissed.